Hi everyone, I had some time this week and made further progress on 1254. Still working out some kinks but I'll see how far I can get over the weekend. Have a good 4th.
--Ted On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Ted — I think we should get that work into the next release. Thus, if you > need more time (reasonable amount), then I say we delay accordingly. > > NOTE: The Gremlin-Python stuff will not get into the next release. It has > gotten really complex/powerful and is currently 100+ commits ahead of > master/ ! :) .. As such, given the gargantuan undertaking, we will save > this work for a future release. > > Thanks, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > > > > > On Jun 28, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > I would like to get TinkerPop-1254 in before code freeze. Shooting for > > finishing it up by end of this week but I'll drop a note if it looks > like I > > won't make it. > > > > --Ted > > > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> It's end of June - time to start firming up for release. We have a > number > >> of outstanding PRs that need votes/merge. Perhaps we try to get those > all > >> in this week and begin code freeze next Monday (7/4)? > >> > >> I think we'll have to postpone the GLV work with gremlin-python for this > >> release. There's just too much left to do to get that in "right". Are > there > >> any other open issues of importance? > >> > >> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Yes, end of June-ish is best for me as I have few things on my plate > the > >>> first half of this month. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Marko. > >>> > >>> http://markorodriguez.com > >>> > >>> > >>>> On Jun 6, 2016, at 4:46 AM, Stephen Mallette <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> We didn't really discuss a date for release on this thread. I was > >>> thinking > >>>> that we could start looking at the week of July 4th as the target week > >>> for > >>>> VOTE and nail down a date as we get closer. > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> I'd think from a TinkerPop branding perspective, it probably helps to > >>> have > >>>>> the name in there. It's Apache TinkerPop, not Apache Gremlin. > >>>>> > >>>>> I just took a quick look on a mirror, and some other Apache projects > >>>>> (Spark, Kafka, HBase, NiFi, Pig, Zookeeper) don't even include apache > >> in > >>>>> their distributables, so maybe we can just do: > >>>>> > >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > >>>>> tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 11:03 AM Stephen Mallette < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> jason i think that was a suggestion to conform more to standard > >> apache > >>>>>> releases from someone in incubator. if it was mandatory we would > have > >>>>>> burned for that too many times to count at this point. i'm good to > >>> change > >>>>>> it if everyone else is. what do we want them to be? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-console-x.y.z.zip > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-server-x.y.z.zip > >>>>>> > >>>>>> or the full business: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-console-x.y.z.zip > >>>>>> apache-tinkerpop-gremlin-server-x.y.z.zip > >>>>>> > >>>>>> i guess we lost "-incubating" now so the latter doesn't look so bad > >> to > >>> me > >>>>>> anymore. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Marko Rodriguez < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Yes, an imminent release is good. There are 2 severe bug fixes in > >>>>> master/ > >>>>>>> (3.2.1) that I would like to get out there. 3.2.0 had lots of > >> internal > >>>>>>> changes to OLAP and I paid the price by incurring bugs. :| > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be > >>>>> named > >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> There is really no such thing as "tinkerpop" besides the source > code > >>>>>> which > >>>>>>> is distributed as apache-tinkerpop-*.zip. The two other > >> distributions > >>>>> are > >>>>>>> gremlin-console and gremlin-server and I think we should keep those > >>>>>> naming > >>>>>>> conventions as they are so they reflect what is being distributed. > >>>>> Thus, > >>>>>> I > >>>>>>> think the naming of our artifacts is correct. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>> Marko. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> http://markorodriguez.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On May 25, 2016, at 8:38 AM, Jason Plurad <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Somebody had mentioned that our distributables are supposed to be > >>>>> named > >>>>>>>> apache-tinkerpop*.zip instead of apache-gremlin*.zip. Maybe that's > >>>>>>>> something that should be done along with this release. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- Jason > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Stephen Mallette < > >>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> cool, Ted. it would be good to have another hand there. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Ted Wilmes <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think a release sounds good. I'd be interested in witnessing > >> the > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> post-PMC vote release steps so that I might be able to help out > >> on > >>>>> an > >>>>>>>>>> upcoming release. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> --Ted > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Marvin Froeder < > >> [email protected] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Your are right, for some reason I though it was on the > >> artifactId > >>>>> as > >>>>>>>>> well > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Stephen Mallette < > >>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we need to relocate anything. The "-incubating" > >> is > >>>>>> just > >>>>>>>>>> in > >>>>>>>>>>>> the version name, so we will just remove it for future > >> releases. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 4:55 AM, Jean-Baptiste Musso < > >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a good idea. This could make these releases > >> look > >>>>>>>>> more > >>>>>>>>>>>>> "stable": I've often felt that the -incubating suffix somehow > >>>>> made > >>>>>>>>>>>>> releases look "alpha-ish" / "beta-ish", even though they were > >>>>> not. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Naming aside, bug fixes never hurt. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:49 AM, Stephen Mallette < > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've seen a lot of good fixes/optimizations to 3.1.3 and > >> 3.2.1 > >>>>>>>>>> and I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wonder if we shouldn't exercise our new found TLP powers to > >> do > >>>>> a > >>>>>>>>>>>> release > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and get rid of the "-incubating" at the end of our "current" > >>>>>>>>>>>>> distributions > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and artifacts. thoughts? > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
