If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or whatever it’s called) java code that turns the war files into the assembly.
I.e. add a line to delete it. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > If anyone knows how to exclude jakarta.activation-api in the new bom > module, I'd sure appreciate the help. I'd expect > > <exclusion> <!-- Is already included in java-ee-api --> > <artifactId>jakarta.activation</artifactId> > <groupId>jakarta.activation-api</groupId> > </exclusion> > > to work, but it seems like no matter where I exclude it, it keeps popping > up. > > Jon > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Awesome, thanks for the detail. I'm working on the PR now. I post updates > > here as I have them. Intention is to have take 2 rolled by the end of the > > evening. > > > > Have a safe flight! > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggeration :) > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have > to > >> > start again on cell :) > >> > > >> > Agree with all your removals. Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll > >> want > >> > to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that > ready. > >> > > >> > We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add the > >> EPL > >> > v2. When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only some of > >> them > >> > had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists have > the > >> > ecj jar so need the EPL v1. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> >> Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6: > >> >> > >> >> javax.activation: > >> >> - lib/activation-1.1.jar > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > >> >> > >> >> javax.xml.stream: > >> >> - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > >> >> > >> >> javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, > >> javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class > >> >> and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: > >> >> - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > >> >> > >> >> So I think removing the following is the way to go: > >> >> > >> >> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by > >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) > >> >> jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar (covered by > >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) > >> >> geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by > javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by > >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar) > >> >> geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > >> >> jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > >> >> > >> >> I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong. > >> >> > >> >> Jon > >> >> > >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins < > david.blev...@gmail.com > >> > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > >> >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure > >> what do > >> >> > with > >> >> > > this conflict: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, > >> >> > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class > >> >> > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar > >> >> > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Any thoughts? > >> >> > > >> >> > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past release. > >> >> > > >> >> > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x, we > >> ignore > >> >> > for now. So if this one is status quo, it's fine. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -David > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > -- > >> > Sent from Gmail Mobile > >> > > >> -- > >> Sent from Gmail Mobile > >> > > > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
