Somewhere in here: - https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/apache-tomee/src/main/groovy/commands/SetupCommand.groovy#L58
Hello from SFO baggage claim in route to CodeOne! :) On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:00 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or > whatever it’s called) java code that turns the war files into the assembly. > > I.e. add a line to delete it. > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> If anyone knows how to exclude jakarta.activation-api in the new bom >> module, I'd sure appreciate the help. I'd expect >> >> <exclusion> <!-- Is already included in java-ee-api --> >> <artifactId>jakarta.activation</artifactId> >> <groupId>jakarta.activation-api</groupId> >> </exclusion> >> >> to work, but it seems like no matter where I exclude it, it keeps popping >> up. >> >> Jon >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Jonathan Gallimore < >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > Awesome, thanks for the detail. I'm working on the PR now. I post >> updates >> > here as I have them. Intention is to have take 2 rolled by the end of >> the >> > evening. >> > >> > Have a safe flight! >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggeration :) >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have >> to >> >> > start again on cell :) >> >> > >> >> > Agree with all your removals. Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll >> >> want >> >> > to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that >> ready. >> >> > >> >> > We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add >> the >> >> EPL >> >> > v2. When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only some >> of >> >> them >> >> > had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists have >> the >> >> > ecj jar so need the EPL v1. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore < >> >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6: >> >> >> >> >> >> javax.activation: >> >> >> - lib/activation-1.1.jar >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar >> >> >> >> >> >> javax.xml.stream: >> >> >> - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar >> >> >> >> >> >> javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, >> >> javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class >> >> >> and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: >> >> >> - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar >> >> >> >> >> >> So I think removing the following is the way to go: >> >> >> >> >> >> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by >> >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) >> >> >> jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar (covered by >> >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) >> >> >> geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by >> javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) >> >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by >> >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar) >> >> >> geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) >> >> >> jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) >> >> >> >> >> >> I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong. >> >> >> >> >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins < >> david.blev...@gmail.com >> >> > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < >> >> >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure >> >> what do >> >> >> > with >> >> >> > > this conflict: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, >> >> >> > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class >> >> >> > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar >> >> >> > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > Any thoughts? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past >> release. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x, we >> >> ignore >> >> >> > for now. So if this one is status quo, it's fine. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -David >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> > Sent from Gmail Mobile >> >> > >> >> -- >> >> Sent from Gmail Mobile >> >> >> > >> > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
