Ok, got further. Hopefully now just update the license file, and then roll
the release.

Jon

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:23 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Tried that, right next to where swizzle-stream is removed - get this - it
> didn't work. Also tried the installer - same. I fear my sanity is leaving
> me...
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Somewhere in here:
>>
>> -
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/apache-tomee/src/main/groovy/commands/SetupCommand.groovy#L58
>>
>> Hello from SFO baggage claim in route to CodeOne! :)
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:00 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or
>> > whatever it’s called) java code that turns the war files into the
>> assembly.
>> >
>> > I.e. add a line to delete it.
>> >
>> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> If anyone knows how to exclude jakarta.activation-api in the new bom
>> >> module, I'd sure appreciate the help. I'd expect
>> >>
>> >>           <exclusion> <!-- Is already included in java-ee-api -->
>> >>             <artifactId>jakarta.activation</artifactId>
>> >>             <groupId>jakarta.activation-api</groupId>
>> >>           </exclusion>
>> >>
>> >> to work, but it seems like no matter where I exclude it, it keeps
>> popping
>> >> up.
>> >>
>> >> Jon
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> >> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Awesome, thanks for the detail. I'm working on the PR now. I post
>> >> updates
>> >> > here as I have them. Intention is to have take 2 rolled by the end of
>> >> the
>> >> > evening.
>> >> >
>> >> > Have a safe flight!
>> >> >
>> >> > Jon
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM David Blevins <
>> dblev...@tomitribe.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggeration :)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM David Blevins <
>> dblev...@tomitribe.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I
>> have
>> >> to
>> >> >> > start again on cell :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Agree with all your removals.  Note on Jakarta activation 1.2,
>> we’ll
>> >> >> want
>> >> >> > to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that
>> >> ready.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add
>> >> the
>> >> >> EPL
>> >> >> > v2.  When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only
>> some
>> >> of
>> >> >> them
>> >> >> > had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists
>> have
>> >> the
>> >> >> > ecj jar so need the EPL v1.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>> >> >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> javax.activation:
>> >> >> >> - lib/activation-1.1.jar
>> >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> javax.xml.stream:
>> >> >> >> - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar
>> >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
>> >> >> javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
>> >> >> >> and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
>> >> >> >> - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar
>> >> >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> So I think removing the following is the way to go:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by
>> >> >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
>> >> >> >> jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar  (covered by
>> >> >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
>> >> >> >> geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by
>> >> javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
>> >> >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by
>> >> >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar)
>> >> >> >> geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
>> >> >> >> jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Jon
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins <
>> >> david.blev...@gmail.com
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> >> >> >> > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too
>> sure
>> >> >> what do
>> >> >> >> > with
>> >> >> >> > > this conflict:
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
>> >> >> >> > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
>> >> >> >> > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar
>> >> >> >> > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Any thoughts?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past
>> >> release.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x,
>> we
>> >> >> ignore
>> >> >> >> > for now.  So if this one is status quo, it's fine.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > -David
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >>
>> > --
>> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> >
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>

Reply via email to