That's a good suggestion, thank you. Must admit, I'm surprised. I thought
the whole bom thing was meant to make this easier. I must be missing
something.

Jon

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:00 AM David Blevins <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or
> whatever it’s called) java code that turns the war files into the assembly.
>
> I.e. add a line to delete it.
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If anyone knows how to exclude jakarta.activation-api in the new bom
> > module, I'd sure appreciate the help. I'd expect
> >
> >           <exclusion> <!-- Is already included in java-ee-api -->
> >             <artifactId>jakarta.activation</artifactId>
> >             <groupId>jakarta.activation-api</groupId>
> >           </exclusion>
> >
> > to work, but it seems like no matter where I exclude it, it keeps popping
> > up.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 10:03 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Awesome, thanks for the detail. I'm working on the PR now. I post
> updates
> > > here as I have them. Intention is to have take 2 rolled by the end of
> the
> > > evening.
> > >
> > > Have a safe flight!
> > >
> > > Jon
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM David Blevins <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggeration :)
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM David Blevins <[email protected]
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have
> > to
> > >> > start again on cell :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Agree with all your removals.  Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll
> > >> want
> > >> > to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that
> > ready.
> > >> >
> > >> > We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add
> the
> > >> EPL
> > >> > v2.  When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only some
> of
> > >> them
> > >> > had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists have
> > the
> > >> > ecj jar so need the EPL v1.
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> javax.activation:
> > >> >> - lib/activation-1.1.jar
> > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> > >> >>
> > >> >> javax.xml.stream:
> > >> >> - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar
> > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> > >> >>
> > >> >> javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
> > >> javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
> > >> >> and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
> > >> >> - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar
> > >> >> - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> > >> >>
> > >> >> So I think removing the following is the way to go:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by
> > >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
> > >> >> jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar  (covered by
> > >> >> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
> > >> >> geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by
> > javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> > >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by
> > >> >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar)
> > >> >> geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> > >> >> jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Jon
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins <
> > [email protected]
> > >> >
> > >> >> wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >> >> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure
> > >> what do
> > >> >> > with
> > >> >> > > this conflict:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
> > >> >> > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
> > >> >> > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar
> > >> >> > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar
> > >> >> > >
> > >> >> > > Any thoughts?
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past
> release.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x, we
> > >> ignore
> > >> >> > for now.  So if this one is status quo, it's fine.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > -David
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >
> > >> >>
> > >> > --
> > >> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
> > >> >
> > >> --
> > >> Sent from Gmail Mobile
> > >>
> > >
> >
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>

Reply via email to