I've added ECL 1, referencing ECJ, and EPL 2, referencing Jakarta Activation, Jakarta XML Bind API, Jakarta XML SOAP API. Does that sound right?
Jon On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:54 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com> wrote: > Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have to > start again on cell :) > > Agree with all your removals. Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll want > to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that ready. > > We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add the EPL > v2. When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only some of them > had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists have the > ecj jar so need the EPL v1. > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6: > > > > javax.activation: > > - lib/activation-1.1.jar > > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > > > > javax.xml.stream: > > - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar > > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > > > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: > > - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar > > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar > > > > So I think removing the following is the way to go: > > > > geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by > > jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) > > jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar (covered by > jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar) > > geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by > > geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar) > > geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > > jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar) > > > > I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong. > > > > Jon > > > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure what > do > > > with > > > > this conflict: > > > > > > > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, > > > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class > > > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class: > > > > > > > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar > > > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past release. > > > > > > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x, we > ignore > > > for now. So if this one is status quo, it's fine. > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile >