I've added ECL 1, referencing ECJ, and EPL 2, referencing Jakarta
Activation, Jakarta XML Bind API, Jakarta XML SOAP API. Does that sound
right?

Jon

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:54 PM David Blevins <dblev...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have to
> start again on cell :)
>
> Agree with all your removals.  Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll want
> to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that ready.
>
> We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each dust to add the EPL
> v2.  When I looked at this a few days ago, I also noticed only some of them
> had the EPL v1, so that should get fixed as well; all our dists have the
> ecj jar so need the EPL v1.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:38 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6:
> >
> > javax.activation:
> > - lib/activation-1.1.jar
> > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> >
> > javax.xml.stream:
> > - lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar
> > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> >
> > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
> javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
> > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
> > - lib/openejb-client-7.0.6.jar
> > - lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
> >
> > So I think removing the following is the way to go:
> >
> > geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar (covered by
> > jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
> > jakarta.activation-api-1.2.1.jar  (covered by
> jakarta.activation-1.2.1.jar)
> > geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> > geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar (covered by
> > geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.9.0-alpha-2.jar)
> > geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> > jakarta.xml.soap-api-1.4.1.jar (covered by javaee-api-8.0-2.jar)
> >
> > I'll get started, but please do shout if that looks wrong.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:19 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure what
> do
> > > with
> > > > this conflict:
> > > >
> > > > javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class,
> > > javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
> > > > and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
> > > >
> > > > - javaee-api-8.0-2.jar
> > > > - openejb-client-8.0.0.jar
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > Only suspecting it might have already been there in a past release.
> > >
> > > If that's the case, IMO, any conflicts that were there in 7.x, we
> ignore
> > > for now.  So if this one is status quo, it's fine.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> >
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>

Reply via email to