Christian Lohmaier wrote: > >> This is one of the reasons for including copies of external libraries > >> in OOo, this is one of the reasons for rejecting contributions not > >> covered by the SCA. > >> > > Nonsense. Every piece of code OOo uses can be modified under at > > least LGPL terms (or looser). There is no reason for SCA. ;) > > Misses the point completely. > Nope. Was replying to the last part of your sentence, and intended it to be somewhat of an off-hand remark. So,
> But please don't drag this thread into politics please. > Didn't start, but surely don't want to wander off from the actual (and important) topic as well. :) Cheers, -- Thorsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
