On 22.04.2013 16:36, Marshall Schor wrote: > Both of these seem OK to me. I did a quick check on RUTAL including Bing web > search and trademarks (USPTO) search - didn't find anything. > > UIMA-RUTAL: +1 > UIMA-TRL: +1
Does that extend your last vote or does it replace it? If it does replace it, then the current votes are: RUTAL +2 TRL +2 RUCOTALA +1 Best, Peter > -Marshall > > On 4/22/2013 5:35 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> I agree with Marshall in most points. >> >> Here are some additional comments: >> >> RUCOTALA is too long in my opinion. >> >> RUCOLA and RUCOTALA are very similar: The acronym is a bit constructed and >> you won't actively use the full name. I think RUCOLA is better than >> RUCOTALA, >> because it is shorter and a real word. >> >> TRL: The name itself is not as nice as others, but it is short and you >> can actively use >> the full name (UIMA Text Rule Language). I think this is important when >> you talk >> to people outside of the UIMA community. They instantely know what you >> are talking about. >> On the other side, that are just three word put together, which doesn't >> sound completely right. >> >> RUCOTALA was derived from the fact that the name should refer to >> something about "text" and maybe "annotation". >> If we reduce that name and remove everything that isn't really >> important, you end up with "RUTAL" >> (Rule-based Text Annotation Language), which I actually prefer a lot >> over RUCOTALA. I have found no problematic (legal) stuff >> concerning "rutal" yet. >> >> I propose, therefore, a new name and cast two votes: >> >> UIMA-RUTAL: +1 >> UIMA-TRL: +1 >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> On 18.04.2013 16:54, Marshall Schor wrote: >>> I'm basically +1 for any of these. >>> >>> Some specific comments: >>> UIMA-TRL - good that it's short an simple. >>> >>> For the rest of the candidates, I think in actual documentation, the full >>> names >>> should not use the upper-case acronym convention - it disrupts the >>> readability, >>> in my opinion. >>> >>> In general, I think the shorter names are preferable. >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >>> On 4/18/2013 6:10 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we are currently looking for a new name for the Apache UIMA TextMarker >>>> system >>>> (language and workbench) and invite the UIMA comunity to vote for a name. >>>> This is not a formal vote. The vote should be cast for one of the following >>>> options, but is not limited to those. >>>> >>>> Option 1: >>>> name: UIMA-TRL >>>> (full) name: UIMA Text Rule Language >>>> package identifier: trl >>>> >>>> Option 2a: >>>> name: UIMA-RUCOLA >>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-based, COncise text annotation LAnguage >>>> package identifier: rucola >>>> >>>> Option 2b: >>>> name: UIMA-RUCOLA >>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-COre (text) LAnguage >>>> package identifier: rucola >>>> >>>> Option 3: >>>> name: UIMA-RUCOTALA >>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-based, COncise Text Annotation LAnguage >>>> package identifier: rucotala >>>> >>>> >>>> Please cast your vote(s): >>>> [ ] +1 Option ... is a suitable name >>>> [ ] 0 Don't care for option ... >>>> [ ] -1 Option ... is not OK, because ... >>>> >>>> All votes are welcome, but only votes of UIMA PMC members are binding. >>>> Votes >>>> with -1 must provide some substantial (e.g. legal) objections. >>>> >>>> The previous discussion about possible names can be found here: >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2811 >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Peter >>>>
