it replaces my last vote :-) -Marshall
On 4/22/2013 11:11 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > On 22.04.2013 16:36, Marshall Schor wrote: >> Both of these seem OK to me. I did a quick check on RUTAL including Bing >> web search and trademarks (USPTO) search - didn't find anything. >> >> UIMA-RUTAL: +1 >> UIMA-TRL: +1 > Does that extend your last vote or does it replace it? > > If it does replace it, then the current votes are: > > RUTAL +2 > TRL +2 > RUCOTALA +1 > > > Best, > > Peter > > >> -Marshall >> >> On 4/22/2013 5:35 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> I agree with Marshall in most points. >>> >>> Here are some additional comments: >>> >>> RUCOTALA is too long in my opinion. >>> >>> RUCOLA and RUCOTALA are very similar: The acronym is a bit constructed and >>> you won't actively use the full name. I think RUCOLA is better than >>> RUCOTALA, >>> because it is shorter and a real word. >>> >>> TRL: The name itself is not as nice as others, but it is short and you >>> can actively use >>> the full name (UIMA Text Rule Language). I think this is important when >>> you talk >>> to people outside of the UIMA community. They instantely know what you >>> are talking about. >>> On the other side, that are just three word put together, which doesn't >>> sound completely right. >>> >>> RUCOTALA was derived from the fact that the name should refer to >>> something about "text" and maybe "annotation". >>> If we reduce that name and remove everything that isn't really >>> important, you end up with "RUTAL" >>> (Rule-based Text Annotation Language), which I actually prefer a lot >>> over RUCOTALA. I have found no problematic (legal) stuff >>> concerning "rutal" yet. >>> >>> I propose, therefore, a new name and cast two votes: >>> >>> UIMA-RUTAL: +1 >>> UIMA-TRL: +1 >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> On 18.04.2013 16:54, Marshall Schor wrote: >>>> I'm basically +1 for any of these. >>>> >>>> Some specific comments: >>>> UIMA-TRL - good that it's short an simple. >>>> >>>> For the rest of the candidates, I think in actual documentation, the full >>>> names >>>> should not use the upper-case acronym convention - it disrupts the >>>> readability, >>>> in my opinion. >>>> >>>> In general, I think the shorter names are preferable. >>>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> >>>> On 4/18/2013 6:10 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> we are currently looking for a new name for the Apache UIMA TextMarker >>>>> system >>>>> (language and workbench) and invite the UIMA comunity to vote for a name. >>>>> This is not a formal vote. The vote should be cast for one of the >>>>> following >>>>> options, but is not limited to those. >>>>> >>>>> Option 1: >>>>> name: UIMA-TRL >>>>> (full) name: UIMA Text Rule Language >>>>> package identifier: trl >>>>> >>>>> Option 2a: >>>>> name: UIMA-RUCOLA >>>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-based, COncise text annotation LAnguage >>>>> package identifier: rucola >>>>> >>>>> Option 2b: >>>>> name: UIMA-RUCOLA >>>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-COre (text) LAnguage >>>>> package identifier: rucola >>>>> >>>>> Option 3: >>>>> name: UIMA-RUCOTALA >>>>> (full) name: UIMA RUle-based, COncise Text Annotation LAnguage >>>>> package identifier: rucotala >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please cast your vote(s): >>>>> [ ] +1 Option ... is a suitable name >>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care for option ... >>>>> [ ] -1 Option ... is not OK, because ... >>>>> >>>>> All votes are welcome, but only votes of UIMA PMC members are binding. >>>>> Votes >>>>> with -1 must provide some substantial (e.g. legal) objections. >>>>> >>>>> The previous discussion about possible names can be found here: >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2811 >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Peter >>>>> >
