Should work just without any preconditions.
What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
Peter
Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
>
> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
>
>
> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec
> <<< FAILURE!
> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> at
> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
> at
> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> at
> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:31)
> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> at
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> at
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
>
>
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & UIMAFit
>> somewhere?
>>
>> ~Burn
>>
>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. This
>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn
>>> reports he
>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
>>>
>>> -Marshall
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our network.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? Can
>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local m2
>>>> folder?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Peter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>> more info:
>>>>>
>>>>> That directory
>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I
>>> can
>>>>> download except the .jar.
>>>>>
>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about
>>> 105K bytes,
>>>>> and then fail.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
>>>>>
>>>>> curl
>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>> Time Current
>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>> Left Speed
>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>> 0:00:12 269k
>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>
>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
>>>>>
>>>>> curl
>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>>>>> t.jar
>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time
>>> Time Current
>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent
>>> Left Speed
>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:--
>>> 0:00:12 263k
>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
>>>>>
>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT
>>> for
>>>>>> advice...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I just went to
>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a
>>> network error
>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Marshall
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to
>>> win32:
>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
>>> not resolve
>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-parent:pom:2.6.1:
>>> Could
>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): GET
>>> request
>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
>>> from
>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
>>> missing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready
>>> for
>>>>>>>>>> voting.
>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>> uima-1138/
>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>
