that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME -Marshall
On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: > man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path > >> mvn -version > Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06; > 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00) > Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3 > Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation > Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 > OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64", > family: "unix" > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Should work just without any preconditions. >> >> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version... >> >> >> Peter >> >> >> >> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>> Failing assertion & stacktrace: >>> >>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType(" >> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2"); >>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4); >>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size()); >>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText()); >>> >>> >>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest >>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec >>> <<< FAILURE! >>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec >>> <<< FAILURE! >>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> >>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) >>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427) >>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78) >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>> at >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall( >> FrameworkMethod.java:44) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >> ReflectiveCallable.java:15) >>> at >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively( >> FrameworkMethod.java:41) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod. >> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >> RunAfters.java:31) >>> at >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) >>> at >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>> at >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >> RunAfters.java:31) >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >> JUnit4Provider.java:252) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >> JUnit4Provider.java:112) >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>> at >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray( >> ReflectionUtils.java:189) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke( >> ProviderFactory.java:165) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider( >> ProviderFactory.java:85) >>> at >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess( >> ForkedBooter.java:115) >>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >> ForkedBooter.java:75) >>> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & >> UIMAFit >>>> somewhere? >>>> >>>> ~Burn >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. >> This >>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn >>>>> reports he >>>>> got past this, this morning, as well... >>>>> >>>>> -Marshall >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our >> network. >>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? >> Can >>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local >> m2 >>>>>> folder? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>> more info: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That directory >>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86 >>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has >>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I >>>>> can >>>>>>> download except the .jar. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about >>>>> 105K bytes, >>>>>>> and then fail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here's the output from curl: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> curl >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>> Time Current >>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>> 0:00:12 269k >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> curl >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>> Time Current >>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>> 0:00:12 263k >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT >>>>> for >>>>>>>> advice... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I just went to >>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a >>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a >>>>> network error >>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a >>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to >>>>> win32: >>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could >>>>> not resolve >>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep- >> parent:pom:2.6.1: >>>>> Could >>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8 >>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1 >>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): >> GET >>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1. >> jar >>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is >>>>> missing. >>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready >>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>> voting. >>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench: >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>> uima-1138/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release >>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND% >>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
