man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path > mvn -version Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06; 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00) Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3 Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64", family: "unix"
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> wrote: > Should work just without any preconditions. > > What build environement do you have? OS, Java version... > > > Peter > > > > Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis: > > Failing assertion & stacktrace: > > > > Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType(" > my.package.one.One.Mtwl2"); > > AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4); > >> assertEquals(1, ai4.size()); > > assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText()); > > > > > > Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest > > Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 sec > > <<< FAILURE! > > test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 sec > > <<< FAILURE! > > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> > > at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) > > at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) > > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) > > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) > > at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427) > > at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(OneEngineTest.java:78) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) > > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) > > at > > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall( > FrameworkMethod.java:44) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run( > ReflectiveCallable.java:15) > > at > > org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively( > FrameworkMethod.java:41) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod. > evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. > evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( > RunAfters.java:31) > > at > > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) > > at > > org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( > BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. > evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) > > at > > org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( > RunAfters.java:31) > > at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( > JUnit4Provider.java:252) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. > executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( > JUnit4Provider.java:112) > > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > > at > > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) > > at > > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( > DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) > > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray( > ReflectionUtils.java:189) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke( > ProviderFactory.java:165) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider( > ProviderFactory.java:85) > > at > > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess( > ForkedBooter.java:115) > > at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( > ForkedBooter.java:75) > > > > > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & > UIMAFit > >> somewhere? > >> > >> ~Burn > >> > >> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. > This > >>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn > >>> reports he > >>> got past this, this morning, as well... > >>> > >>> -Marshall > >>> > >>> > >>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our > network. > >>>> > >>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? > Can > >>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local > m2 > >>>> folder? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Peter > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor: > >>>>> more info: > >>>>> > >>>>> That directory > >>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86 > >>> _64/3.104.1/) has > >>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the files I > >>> can > >>>>> download except the .jar. > >>>>> > >>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get about > >>> 105K bytes, > >>>>> and then fail. > >>>>> > >>>>> Here's the output from curl: > >>>>> > >>>>> curl > >>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ > >>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar > >>>>>> t.jar > >>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time > >>> Time Current > >>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent > >>> Left Speed > >>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- > >>> 0:00:12 269k > >>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer > >>>>> > >>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k: > >>>>> > >>>>> curl > >>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ > >>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar > >>>>>> t.jar > >>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time > >>> Time Current > >>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent > >>> Left Speed > >>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- > >>> 0:00:12 263k > >>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer > >>>>> > >>>>> -Marshall > >>>>> > >>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our IT > >>> for > >>>>>> advice... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Peter > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor: > >>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I just went to > >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ > >>> 64/3.104.1/ in a > >>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced a > >>> network error > >>>>>>> (reported by my browser...) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Marshall > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > >>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a > >>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Peter > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis: > >>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference to > >>> win32: > >>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could > >>> not resolve > >>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep- > parent:pom:2.6.1: > >>> Could > >>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8 > >>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1 > >>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): > GET > >>> request > >>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1. > jar > >>> from > >>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ~Burn > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl < > >>> [email protected]> > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is > >>> missing. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Peter > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl: > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is ready > >>> for > >>>>>>>>>> voting. > >>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine: > >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions > >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules > >>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench: > >>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > >>> uima-1138/ > >>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1 > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Update site: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ > >>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/ > >>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources: > >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ > >>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip > >>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release > >>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ... and here: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% > >>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND% > >>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC > >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care > >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Peter > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>> > >
