Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the v3 compatibility.
Here's my env Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00) Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\.. Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-( Peter Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis: > Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7 > > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME >> >> -Marshall >> >> >> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: >>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path >>> >>>> mvn -version >>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06; >>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00) >>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3 >>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation >>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre >>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64", >>> family: "unix" >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Should work just without any preconditions. >>>> >>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version... >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace: >>>>> >>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType(" >>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2"); >>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4); >>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size()); >>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText()); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest >>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 >> sec >>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 >> sec >>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> >>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) >>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) >>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) >>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) >>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427) >>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test( >> OneEngineTest.java:78) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>> at >>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>>>> at >>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall( >>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively( >>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod. >>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>>> RunAfters.java:31) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) >>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) >>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) >>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>>>> at >>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>>> RunAfters.java:31) >>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112) >>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>> at >>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>>>> at >>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray( >>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke( >>>> ProviderFactory.java:165) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider( >>>> ProviderFactory.java:85) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess( >>>> ForkedBooter.java:115) >>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >>>> ForkedBooter.java:75) >>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & >>>> UIMAFit >>>>>> somewhere? >>>>>> >>>>>> ~Burn >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. >>>> This >>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn >>>>>>> reports he >>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our >>>> network. >>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? >>>> Can >>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local >>>> m2 >>>>>>>> folder? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>>>> more info: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That directory >>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86 >>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has >>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the >> files I >>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>> download except the .jar. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get >> about >>>>>>> 105K bytes, >>>>>>>>> and then fail. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> curl >>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>>>> Time Current >>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k >>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> curl >>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>>>> Time Current >>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k >>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our >> IT >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> advice... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I just went to >>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a >>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced >> a >>>>>>> network error >>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a >>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference >> to >>>>>>> win32: >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could >>>>>>> not resolve >>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep- >>>> parent:pom:2.6.1: >>>>>>> Could >>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8 >>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): >>>> GET >>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1. >>>> jar >>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl < >>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is >>>>>>> missing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is >> ready >>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>> uima-1138/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND% >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>
