this might work:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/jdk/eclipse/index.html Scroll down to where it says: Download the IBM Development Package for Eclipse, Version 5.0, including IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition, Version 7 Release 1: * 32-bit Windows <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win32-5.3.1> * 64-bit Windows <https://www.ibm.com/services/forms/preLogin.do?source=idpe&S_TACT=105AGX05&S_CMP=JDK&lang=en_US&S_PKG=win64-5.3.1> -Marshall On 5/7/2017 10:49 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Looks like finding/downloading IBM Java 7 for windows is not trivial. > > > Peter > > > Am 05.05.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Marshall Schor: >> These things sometimes are artifacts of hash table implementations. >> >> To reproduce, you might need to run with IBM Java. >> >> If possible, can Burn try with Oracle Java 7? >> >> (set JAVA_HOME to that). >> >> -Marshall >> >> >> On 5/5/2017 2:03 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>> Ok that's strange. I know that I changed something in that project >>> because Marshall had problems building it with Java 8 when he tested the >>> v3 compatibility. >>> >>> >>> Here's my env >>> >>> Apache Maven 3.2.5 (12a6b3acb947671f09b81f49094c53f426d8cea1; >>> 2014-12-14T18:29:23+01:00) >>> Maven home: C:\work\misc\apache-maven-3.2.5\bin\.. >>> Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation >>> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_75\jre >>> Default locale: en_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252 >>> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows" >>> >>> >>> I'll try to reproduce it, but I won't be able to do it today :-( >>> >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 05.05.2017 um 00:02 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>> Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7 >>>> >>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME >>>>> >>>>> -Marshall >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote: >>>>>> man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path >>>>>> >>>>>>> mvn -version >>>>>> Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06; >>>>>> 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00) >>>>>> Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3 >>>>>> Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation >>>>>> Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre >>>>>> Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8 >>>>>> OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64", >>>>>> family: "unix" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Should work just without any preconditions. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>>>>>> Failing assertion & stacktrace: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType(" >>>>>>> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2"); >>>>>>>> AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4); >>>>>>>>> assertEquals(1, ai4.size()); >>>>>>>> assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText()); >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest >>>>>>>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307 >>>>> sec >>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>>>>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest) Time elapsed: 2.259 >>>>> sec >>>>>>>> <<< FAILURE! >>>>>>>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0> >>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427) >>>>>>>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test( >>>>> OneEngineTest.java:78) >>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall( >>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:44) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run( >>>>>>> ReflectiveCallable.java:15) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively( >>>>>>> FrameworkMethod.java:41) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod. >>>>>>> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild( >>>>>>> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores. >>>>>>> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate( >>>>>>> RunAfters.java:31) >>>>>>>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute( >>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:252) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider. >>>>>>> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke( >>>>>>> JUnit4Provider.java:112) >>>>>>>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>>>> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke( >>>>>>> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56) >>>>>>>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray( >>>>>>> ReflectionUtils.java:189) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke( >>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:165) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider( >>>>>>> ProviderFactory.java:85) >>>>>>>> at >>>>>>>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess( >>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:115) >>>>>>>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main( >>>>>>> ForkedBooter.java:75) >>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA & >>>>>>> UIMAFit >>>>>>>>> somewhere? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ~Burn >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure. >>>>>>> This >>>>>>>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me). Burn >>>>>>>>>> reports he >>>>>>>>>> got past this, this morning, as well... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our >>>>>>> network. >>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review? >>>>>>> Can >>>>>>>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local >>>>>>> m2 >>>>>>>>>>> folder? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>>>>>>> more info: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> That directory >>>>>>>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86 >>>>>>>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has >>>>>>>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those. All of the >>>>> files I >>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>> download except the .jar. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get >>>>> about >>>>>>>>>> 105K bytes, >>>>>>>>>>>> and then fail. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Here's the output from curl: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> curl >>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>>>>>>> Time Current >>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>>>>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 216k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 269k >>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> curl >>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar >>>>>>>>>>>>> t.jar >>>>>>>>>>>> % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time >>>>>>>>>> Time Current >>>>>>>>>>>> Dload Upload Total Spent >>>>>>>>>> Left Speed >>>>>>>>>>>> 3 2684k 3 105k 0 0 212k 0 0:00:12 --:--:-- >>>>>>>>>> 0:00:12 263k >>>>>>>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our >>>>> IT >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>> advice... >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just went to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_ >>>>>>>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced >>>>> a >>>>>>>>>> network error >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Marshall >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference >>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> win32: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could >>>>>>>>>> not resolve >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep- >>>>>>> parent:pom:2.6.1: >>>>>>>>>> Could >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8 >>>>>>>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/): >>>>>>> GET >>>>>>>>>> request >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1. >>>>>>> jar >>>>>>>>>> from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is >>>>>>>>>> missing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is >>>>> ready >>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voting. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>>>>>>>>> uima-1138/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
