Worked with IBM Java 1.8 ... fails reliably with IBM Java 1.7

On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:

> that is correct - maven uses the value of JAVA_HOME
>
> -Marshall
>
>
> On 5/4/2017 10:45 AM, Burn Lewis wrote:
> > man is apparently using $JAVA_HOME as this is not the java in my path
> >
> >> mvn -version
> > Apache Maven 3.3.3 (7994120775791599e205a5524ec3e0dfe41d4a06;
> > 2015-04-22T07:57:37-04:00)
> > Maven home: /share/apache-maven-3.3.3
> > Java version: 1.7.0, vendor: IBM Corporation
> > Java home: /share/ibm-java-x86_64-70-SR9/jre
> > Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
> > OS name: "linux", version: "2.6.32-431.17.1.el6.x86_64", arch: "amd64",
> > family: "unix"
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM, Peter Klügl <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Should work just without any preconditions.
> >>
> >> What build environement do you have? OS, Java version...
> >>
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 04.05.2017 um 16:36 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>> Failing assertion & stacktrace:
> >>>
> >>>     Type type4 = cas.getTypeSystem().getType("
> >> my.package.one.One.Mtwl2");
> >>>     AnnotationIndex<AnnotationFS> ai4 = cas.getAnnotationIndex(type4);
> >>>>  assertEquals(1, ai4.size());
> >>>     assertEquals("2", ai4.iterator().next().getCoveredText());
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Running org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest
> >>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 2.307
> sec
> >>> <<< FAILURE!
> >>> test(org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest)  Time elapsed: 2.259
> sec
> >>>  <<< FAILURE!
> >>> java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<1> but was:<0>
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:91)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:618)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:126)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:443)
> >>> at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:427)
> >>> at org.apache.uima.ruta.maven.OneEngineTest.test(
> OneEngineTest.java:78)
> >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(
> >> FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(
> >> ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(
> >> FrameworkMethod.java:41)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.
> >> evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> RunAfters.java:31)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:73)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(
> >> BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:46)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.
> >> evaluate(RunBefores.java:28)
> >>> at
> >>> org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(
> >> RunAfters.java:31)
> >>> at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(
> >> JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.
> >> executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(
> >> JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> >>> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:95)
> >>> at
> >>> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> >> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:56)
> >>> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:620)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(
> >> ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(
> >> ProviderFactory.java:165)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(
> >> ProviderFactory.java:85)
> >>> at
> >>> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(
> >> ForkedBooter.java:115)
> >>> at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(
> >> ForkedBooter.java:75)
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Burn Lewis <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Keep getting the same test failure ... do I have to install UIMA &
> >> UIMAFit
> >>>> somewhere?
> >>>>
> >>>> ~Burn
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> The problem seems (somewhat) intermittent. Yesterday, solid failure.
> >> This
> >>>>> morning, first time - it failed, 2nd time it worked (for me).  Burn
> >>>>> reports he
> >>>>> got past this, this morning, as well...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 5/4/2017 3:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> no idea yet. I successfully downloaded the file outside of our
> >> network.
> >>>>>> Any ideas how we can *reasonably* hotfix the problem for the review?
> >> Can
> >>>>>> you download it from somewhere else and manually add it to the local
> >> m2
> >>>>>> folder?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Best,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 19:47 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>>>> more info:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> That directory
> >>>>>>> (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86
> >>>>> _64/3.104.1/) has
> >>>>>>> .jar, .pom, and .md5 and .sha1 for both of those.  All of the
> files I
> >>>>> can
> >>>>>>> download except the .jar.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> In linux, doing a "curl" command on this site, it seems to get
> about
> >>>>> 105K bytes,
> >>>>>>> and then fail.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Here's the output from curl:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> curl
> >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>>>>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time
> >>>>>  Time  Current
> >>>>>>>                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent
> >>>>> Left  Speed
> >>>>>>>   3 2684k    3  105k    0     0   216k      0  0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>>>> 0:00:12  269k
> >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Another go gives the same failure point: after receiving 105k:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> curl
> >>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.jar
> >>>>>>>> t.jar
> >>>>>>>   % Total    % Received % Xferd  Average Speed   Time    Time
> >>>>>  Time  Current
> >>>>>>>                                  Dload  Upload   Total   Spent
> >>>>> Left  Speed
> >>>>>>>   3 2684k    3  105k    0     0   212k      0  0:00:12 --:--:--
> >>>>> 0:00:12  263k
> >>>>>>> curl: (56) Failure when receiving data from the peer
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 10:39 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I was able to download it (from within our network). I'll ask our
> IT
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>> advice...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 16:34 schrieb Marshall Schor:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I just went to
> >>>>>>>>> http://maven.averbis.com/m2/org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_
> >>>>> 64/3.104.1/ in a
> >>>>>>>>> browser, and could see the jar file, but downloading it produced
> a
> >>>>> network error
> >>>>>>>>> (reported by my browser...)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Would be good to get this fixed :-)
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> -Marshall
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 5/3/2017 8:54 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Could maybe some server maintenance (yesterday 18:00 CEST), or a
> >>>>>>>>>> timeout. The server is terribly slow.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 03.05.2017 um 14:51 schrieb Burn Lewis:
> >>>>>>>>>>> My build from the source zip on Linux failed with a reference
> to
> >>>>> win32:
> >>>>>>>>>>> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ruta-ep-parent: Could
> >>>>> not resolve
> >>>>>>>>>>> dependencies for project org.apache.uima:ruta-ep-
> >> parent:pom:2.6.1:
> >>>>> Could
> >>>>>>>>>>> not transfer artifact org.eclipse.swt.win32.win32:x8
> >>>>> 6_64:jar:3.104.1
> >>>>>>>>>>> from/to averbis-osgi-releases (http://maven.averbis.com/m2/):
> >> GET
> >>>>> request
> >>>>>>>>>>> of: org/eclipse/swt/win32/win32/x86_64/3.104.1/x86_64-3.104.1.
> >> jar
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>>>> averbis-osgi-releases failed: Connection reset
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ~Burn
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 3:30 AM, Peter Klügl <
> >>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> a gentle ping :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is now open for almost two weeks and only one vote is
> >>>>> missing.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am 19.04.2017 um 17:32 schrieb Peter Klügl:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.6.1 is
> ready
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> voting.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This bugfix release is not compatible with UIMA 3.0.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Major changes in this release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Language and Analysis Engine:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed problem with empty annotation list expressions
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed false positive match in conjunct rules
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Requires UIMA 2.10.0 and uimaFIT 2.3.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UIMA Ruta Workbench:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> * Fixed Query View
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repository:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
> >>>>> uima-1138/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> SVN tag:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.6.1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Update site:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> eclipse-update-site/ruta/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Archive with all sources:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/ruta-2.6.1-rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> ruta-2.6.1-source-release.zip
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall 7 issues have been fixed for this release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ... and here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%202.6.1ruta%20AND%
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 20component%20%3D%20ruta%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote on release:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 OK to release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ]  0 Don't care
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>
>
>

Reply via email to