Another point worth noting, but not highlighted in the email, is that we
started with 2 working queries.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Number represents the XMark query number. Query 18 uses a user defined
> function. We decided to table this features since I am not sure what is
> involved in implementing user defined functions.
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>    Hello everyone,
>>
>> Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I would
>> like to share.
>>
>> 10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either
>> produce expected result with some error (as you can see below) or have
>> identified sources of error, which is great because they can be worked on!
>>
>> Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query.
>>
>> VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there [image: 😊]
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Shivani
>>
>>
>> Number Received Expected Result Print Expected Result
>> (endline vs space- printing issue) Doesn’t Blow up the frame size Error
>> 113 Yes No Yes None  2 17 Yes No Yes None  3 15 Yes No No Fails for
>> collection, works for doc (bummer:/ )  4 16 Yes No No None  5 11 Yes
>>   (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp) No Yes None  6 12 Yes Yes Yes None
>> 7 1  Yes Yes Yes None  8 4  Yes Yes Yes None  9 5  Yes Yes Yes None  10
>> 6  No No Yes Count Function fails  11 7  No No Yes
>> Count Function fails
>>   12 14 No
>> No
>>   Yes
>>  During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type  13
>> 20
>> No
>>   No
>>   Yes
>>  Same as Above  14 2
>> Yes
>>   Yes
>>   Yes
>>  None  15 3
>> Yes
>>  No
>> Yes
>>  None  16 9  No
>> No
>>   Yes
>>   Query Plan needs Optimization
>>   17 10
>> No
>>   No
>>   Yes
>>   Query Plan needs Optimization
>>   18 8
>> No
>>   No
>>   Yes
>>  Preston’s Hyracks Rule  19 19
>> No
>>   No
>>   Yes
>>  star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result  20 18 Does
>> not  Need Work  Right Now
>>
>>
>>
>>  Sent with Mixmax
>> <https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to