That is a great catch. As Preston mentioned, we are not looking at Query 18
for the summer because it involves a user-defined function. Saying all but
one would be more appropriate and nicer :)

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> wrote:

> Most?  :-)
>
>
> On 7/24/15 1:59 PM, Shivani Mall wrote:
>
>> Thank you Till. It would be really awesome if most work by the end of
>> summer.
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>  It’s indeed a great update!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Till
>>>
>>>  On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>
>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I
>>>>
>>> would like to share.
>>>
>>>> 10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either
>>>>
>>> produce expected result with some error (as you can see below) or have
>>> identified sources of error, which is great because they can be worked
>>> on!
>>>
>>>> Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query.
>>>>
>>>> VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there <attachment-1.png>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Shivani
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Number        Received Expected Result        Print Expected Result
>>>> (endline vs space- printing issue)    Doesn’t Blow up the frame size
>>>>
>>> Error
>>>
>>>> 1     13      Yes     No      Yes     None
>>>> 2     17      Yes     No      Yes     None
>>>> 3     15      Yes     No      No      Fails for collection, works for
>>>>
>>> doc (bummer:/ )
>>>
>>>> 4     16      Yes     No      No      None
>>>> 5     11      Yes   (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp)       No
>>>>
>>> Yes     None
>>>
>>>> 6     12      Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>> 7     1       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>> 8     4       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>> 9     5       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>> 10    6       No      No      Yes     Count Function fails
>>>> 11    7       No      No      Yes
>>>> Count Function fails
>>>> 12    14      No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type
>>>> 13    20
>>>> No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> Same as Above
>>>> 14    2
>>>> Yes
>>>> Yes
>>>> Yes
>>>> None
>>>> 15    3
>>>> Yes
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> None
>>>> 16    9       No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization
>>>> 17    10
>>>> No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization
>>>> 18    8
>>>> No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> Preston’s Hyracks Rule
>>>> 19    19
>>>> No
>>>> No
>>>> Yes
>>>> star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result
>>>> 20    18      Does not        Need    Work    Right Now
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sent with Mixmax <
>>>>
>>>
>>> https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to