Thank you Till. It would be really awesome if most work by the end of
summer.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote:

> It’s indeed a great update!
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> > On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] <mailto:
> [email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I
> would like to share.
> >
> > 10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either
> produce expected result with some error (as you can see below) or have
> identified sources of error, which is great because they can be worked on!
> >
> > Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query.
> >
> > VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there <attachment-1.png>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Shivani
> >
> >
> > Number        Received Expected Result        Print Expected Result
> > (endline vs space- printing issue)    Doesn’t Blow up the frame size
> Error
> > 1     13      Yes     No      Yes     None
> > 2     17      Yes     No      Yes     None
> > 3     15      Yes     No      No      Fails for collection, works for
> doc (bummer:/ )
> > 4     16      Yes     No      No      None
> > 5     11      Yes   (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp)       No
> Yes     None
> > 6     12      Yes     Yes     Yes     None
> > 7     1       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
> > 8     4       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
> > 9     5       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
> > 10    6       No      No      Yes     Count Function fails
> > 11    7       No      No      Yes
> > Count Function fails
> > 12    14      No
> > No
> > Yes
> > During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type
> > 13    20
> > No
> > No
> > Yes
> > Same as Above
> > 14    2
> > Yes
> > Yes
> > Yes
> > None
> > 15    3
> > Yes
> > No
> > Yes
> > None
> > 16    9       No
> > No
> > Yes
> > Query Plan needs Optimization
> > 17    10
> > No
> > No
> > Yes
> > Query Plan needs Optimization
> > 18    8
> > No
> > No
> > Yes
> > Preston’s Hyracks Rule
> > 19    19
> > No
> > No
> > Yes
> > star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result
> > 20    18      Does not        Need    Work    Right Now
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent with Mixmax <
> https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax
> >
>

Reply via email to