It’s indeed a great update! Cheers, Till
> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I would > like to share. > > 10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either produce > expected result with some error (as you can see below) or have identified > sources of error, which is great because they can be worked on! > > Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query. > > VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there <attachment-1.png> > > Cheers, > Shivani > > > Number Received Expected Result Print Expected Result > (endline vs space- printing issue) Doesn’t Blow up the frame size Error > 1 13 Yes No Yes None > 2 17 Yes No Yes None > 3 15 Yes No No Fails for collection, works for doc > (bummer:/ ) > 4 16 Yes No No None > 5 11 Yes (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp) No Yes > None > 6 12 Yes Yes Yes None > 7 1 Yes Yes Yes None > 8 4 Yes Yes Yes None > 9 5 Yes Yes Yes None > 10 6 No No Yes Count Function fails > 11 7 No No Yes > Count Function fails > 12 14 No > No > Yes > During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type > 13 20 > No > No > Yes > Same as Above > 14 2 > Yes > Yes > Yes > None > 15 3 > Yes > No > Yes > None > 16 9 No > No > Yes > Query Plan needs Optimization > 17 10 > No > No > Yes > Query Plan needs Optimization > 18 8 > No > No > Yes > Preston’s Hyracks Rule > 19 19 > No > No > Yes > star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result > 20 18 Does not Need Work Right Now > > > > Sent with Mixmax > <https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax>
