I just noticed that Preston did not exactly say that on the email chain. However, in our offline conversations he mentioned that.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Shivani Mall <[email protected]> wrote: > That is a great catch. As Preston mentioned, we are not looking at Query > 18 for the summer because it involves a user-defined function. Saying all > but one would be more appropriate and nicer :) > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Most? :-) >> >> >> On 7/24/15 1:59 PM, Shivani Mall wrote: >> >>> Thank you Till. It would be really awesome if most work by the end of >>> summer. >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> It’s indeed a great update! >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Till >>>> >>>> On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] <mailto: >>>>> >>>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello everyone, >>>>> >>>>> Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I >>>>> >>>> would like to share. >>>> >>>>> 10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either >>>>> >>>> produce expected result with some error (as you can see below) or have >>>> identified sources of error, which is great because they can be worked >>>> on! >>>> >>>>> Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query. >>>>> >>>>> VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there <attachment-1.png> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Shivani >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Number Received Expected Result Print Expected Result >>>>> (endline vs space- printing issue) Doesn’t Blow up the frame size >>>>> >>>> Error >>>> >>>>> 1 13 Yes No Yes None >>>>> 2 17 Yes No Yes None >>>>> 3 15 Yes No No Fails for collection, works for >>>>> >>>> doc (bummer:/ ) >>>> >>>>> 4 16 Yes No No None >>>>> 5 11 Yes (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp) No >>>>> >>>> Yes None >>>> >>>>> 6 12 Yes Yes Yes None >>>>> 7 1 Yes Yes Yes None >>>>> 8 4 Yes Yes Yes None >>>>> 9 5 Yes Yes Yes None >>>>> 10 6 No No Yes Count Function fails >>>>> 11 7 No No Yes >>>>> Count Function fails >>>>> 12 14 No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type >>>>> 13 20 >>>>> No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> Same as Above >>>>> 14 2 >>>>> Yes >>>>> Yes >>>>> Yes >>>>> None >>>>> 15 3 >>>>> Yes >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> None >>>>> 16 9 No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization >>>>> 17 10 >>>>> No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization >>>>> 18 8 >>>>> No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> Preston’s Hyracks Rule >>>>> 19 19 >>>>> No >>>>> No >>>>> Yes >>>>> star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result >>>>> 20 18 Does not Need Work Right Now >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent with Mixmax < >>>>> >>>> >>>> https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax >>>> >>> >> >
