Haha, most definitely.
But I would agree that all but one makes for a more focused goal.

Thank you!


On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]> wrote:

> Excellent!  (I was kidding more than that - all but one would be terrific.)
>
>
> On 7/24/15 2:14 PM, Shivani Mall wrote:
>
>> That is a great catch. As Preston mentioned, we are not looking at Query
>> 18
>> for the summer because it involves a user-defined function. Saying all but
>> one would be more appropriate and nicer :)
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Michael Carey <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Most?  :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/24/15 1:59 PM, Shivani Mall wrote:
>>>
>>>  Thank you Till. It would be really awesome if most work by the end of
>>>> summer.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>   It’s indeed a great update!
>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>   On Jul 24, 2015, at 9:01 AM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] <mailto:
>>>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>  Hello everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope you’re having an amazing summer! Here is a great update that I
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  would like to share.
>>>>>
>>>>>  10 out of 20 XMark Queries now run on VXQuery. Rest 10 queries either
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  produce expected result with some error (as you can see below) or
>>>>> have
>>>>> identified sources of error, which is great because they can be worked
>>>>> on!
>>>>>
>>>>>  Please refer to the table below for a detailed analysis on each query.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VXQuery is just about to take over!!…Almost there <attachment-1.png>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Shivani
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Number        Received Expected Result        Print Expected Result
>>>>>> (endline vs space- printing issue)    Doesn’t Blow up the frame size
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Error
>>>>>
>>>>>  1     13      Yes     No      Yes     None
>>>>>> 2     17      Yes     No      Yes     None
>>>>>> 3     15      Yes     No      No      Fails for collection, works for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  doc (bummer:/ )
>>>>>
>>>>>  4     16      Yes     No      No      None
>>>>>> 5     11      Yes   (on Preston’s Mac fails on my comp)       No
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Yes     None
>>>>>
>>>>>  6     12      Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>>>> 7     1       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>>>> 8     4       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>>>> 9     5       Yes     Yes     Yes     None
>>>>>> 10    6       No      No      Yes     Count Function fails
>>>>>> 11    7       No      No      Yes
>>>>>> Count Function fails
>>>>>> 12    14      No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> During Dynamic Evaluation Phase Dynamic Type does not match the type
>>>>>> 13    20
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Same as Above
>>>>>> 14    2
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> None
>>>>>> 15    3
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> None
>>>>>> 16    9       No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization
>>>>>> 17    10
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Query Plan needs Optimization
>>>>>> 18    8
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> Preston’s Hyracks Rule
>>>>>> 19    19
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> No
>>>>>> Yes
>>>>>> star(*) needs implementation otherwise gives the right result
>>>>>> 20    18      Does not        Need    Work    Right Now
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent with Mixmax <
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> https://mixmax.com/s/79uMSuhLo9LCHg4rC?utm_source=mixmax&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature_link&utm_content=sent_with_mixmax
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Reply via email to