> Please please please. Let's do that AFTER the initial set of obvious > problems have been addressed. Otherwise we won't get useful > information. > > Pick *any* of the current designs. Any of them. They all at least > manage > to improve the most conspicous problems with the page. Let's get that > first bit done. And THEN put up a survey for continued improvement. > > Sound good? > > I won't even argue over which one we pick, if we agree to pick one ASAP > and put up the survey right after that. > > How's what? Yes?
Well... I am uncertain. Generally, I have agreed that all that Daniel has said. However, I am not sure this latest idea is the greatest. Changing the website to one of our current designs NOW, will result in a lesser impact when OOo2.0 comes out. What I propose is slightly different. Since we have 4 viable proposals: - 2 x OOoWeb2 (Mine) - 1 x Murb - 1 x Jacqueline I propose this: We let the voting process go through, to determine which web site we are going to use on the release of OOo 2.0, and then use one of the other ones in the interim, meaning that all of the work we have been putting in is not totally in vain. It also reserves the "chosen" web site until the release of OOo 2.0, which adds to the WOW! effect. Just an idea. Opinions? Kind Regards, -- Matthew Wardrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
