Nicu,
>Daniel Carrera wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 07:20:56PM +1300, Graham Lauder wrote: >> >>>...since the discussion on the frontpage of the website. >>> >>>The date stated was 14th - 15th Feb for voting on the new one >>>Although I am a little ahead of everyone else, that makes it today. >>> >>>Any news? >> >> >> Welcome to OOo. The traditional way to kill a project is to send it to the >> project leads for discussion. > >well, because i'm in a flame mood, i will add my two cents (cheap >shot?): it seems the design developed at >https://www.sc40.sfo.collab.net/proposals/murb/2.6/ is not ready and >the voting should be delayed until it catch-up and is in the state to >be declared the winner. There are no "winners" here. There is rather a design that meets the needs of the project. But yes, Maarten's design is, afaict--and I've been isolated from the INternet for the last week--still being tested. It makes no sense, as I have said, to go with something that can't work. Best Louis PS, flames are not allowed on this list. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
