Nicu Buculei wrote: > for certain reasons, the PL list is not public. in the short time i was > member of it (as co-lead of a NL project) i have not seen anything > deserving secrecy.
I think it's pretty amazing that an "open source" project can have such a rigid policy of closedness and secrecy. The PL list, the marketing SMP and the PR list all come to mind. The more I think about it, the more tempting that Novell/Ximian fork looks. > anyway, i will assume responsibility, break the rule and post a part of > the discuss from a thread titled *Debate and Vote on OpenOffice.org > Homepage* Thank you Nicu. I think the post was informative. Best, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
