Hi *,

some late comments from me again :-)

On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:30:25PM +0100, :murb: [maarten brouwers] wrote:
> Hi Designers (Ivan, Randy, ...), Louis, and all others,
> >>... but the larger contours have indeed been laid out by now. I 
> >>personally don't expect huge changes anymore...
> >
> >Okay. I see the virtue of the minimalist design. The drawback of *not* 
> >having a centralizing graphic i(or set of icons) s that they eye is 
> >not sure where to look. Basic art and design theory and practice.  I 
> >would strongly advocate putting icons that not only add aesthetic 
> >pleasure but also aid the visitor.
> >
> A quick mockup of some icons (these definitely need to be tweaked):
> 
> http://www.murb.nl/extern/openoffice.org/iconsactionstatement/

The learn and download ones are suitable already, but the "do more" and
"participate" ones don't quite fit. The participate ones looks like a
graveyard (maybe that one just reminds me of the cover of Master of
Puppets from Metallica) - and the do more one resembles a red-cross type
thing (like a medicine cabinet) or a patch to heal things.

And maybe it is just because I'm a gnome user where the help metaphor is
a life buoy - I kind of expected that instead of the questionmark..

So suggestions: Instead of the multiple crosses, make it multiple
gameboard-figures (the simple ones with a sphere as head, and a simple
cone as body), the "more one" can be turned away from the cabinet
metaphor by placing the plus inside a round shape, instead of using the
square background (like the questionmark - just put the + inside that
circle and it will look more like "add someting", well to me at least)
Whether to change the help one to a life buoy or not probably is a
matter of taste/focus...

But apart from that I really think that the proposal will benefit from
any type of icons.

ciao
Christian
-- 
NP: Korn - Fake

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to