If it was a podling, sure:

https://whimsy.apache.org/docs/api/ASF/Podling.html#method-i-dev_mail_list

If it wasn't a podling previously, then perhaps not.

- Sam Ruby


On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:58 PM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
> subject: Congratulations to the new Apache project %project%
> to: %dev-list%
> reply-to: %dev-list%
> cc: board
> from: %secretary%
> body: At this month's Apache Board meeting, the board voted to approve 
> %project%
> as a new Top Level Project with %chair% as PMC Chair.
>
> Best,
>
> %secretary%
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>
> I think we already know what %project% and %chair% are. But can we calculate 
> %dev-list%?
>
> Craig
>
>> On Jul 21, 2017, at 8:15 AM, Sam Ruby <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Craig Russell <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Adjournment again.
>>>
>>> Change PMC chair resolutions result in sending Congratulations message.
>>>
>>> Would it be possible to change the email:
>>>
>>> to: new-chair1, new-chair2, ... new-chair3
>>> cc: board, pmc1, pmc2, ... pmc3
>>>
>>> For existing pmcs with a new chair, this acknowledges the new chair.
>>>
>>> For graduating pmcs, this acknowledges their graduation.
>>>
>>> Should we have a different message for the two cases?
>>>
>>> Should we have a congratulations on graduating from the incubator?
>>
>> Two complicating factors, both addressable with if checks on the
>> server and possibly new messages:
>>
>> 1) currently, the list is limited to, and the message focuses on, new
>> PMC chairs, i.e., people who are now chairs but previously were not
>> chairs of any other committee.
>>
>> 2) not all new committees are graduated podlings.  Sometimes they form
>> via mitosis from an existing PMC.  Other times the are simply new.
>>
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> Craig L Russell
>>> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
>>> [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> [email protected] http://db.apache.org/jdo
>

Reply via email to