Thanks for pointing this out Chris, I'll update the site. FYI committers can view the official list here: https://whimsy3.apache.org/roster/committee/zookeeper
Patrick On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote: > I had miscounted the vote from Raúl as non-binding, based on this page > listing him as committer instead of PMC. > > http://zookeeper.apache.org/credits.html > > Thank you for the clarification. We have the votes we need. > > (Side note: let's update that page.) > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 7/19/16, 9:44 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>What are the votes you're counting? I thought that myself, Raul, and Pat >>had voted +1. The three of us are PMC members. >> >>-Flavio >> >>> On 19 Jul 2016, at 21:41, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> >>>wrote: >>> >>> I'm back. Thanks to everyone who kept testing and voting while I was >>>out. >>> >>> At this point, the tally is: >>> >>> 2 +1 (binding) >>> 5 +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> Can we please get one more PMC member to try the release candidate and >>> cast a vote? (Camille, thank you for your testing and investigation of >>> the test failures you saw. I understand the choice to abstain.) >>> >>> --Chris Nauroth >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 7/7/16, 11:16 AM, "Michael Han" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Add my data points: >>>> Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04). >>>> Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in 5 >>>> runs. >>>> Source used for testing: >>>> >>>>http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zoo >>>>ke >>>> eper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec >>>>> FAILED >>>>> Waiting for server down >>>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(Reconf >>>>>ig >>>>> Test.java:436) >>>>> at >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUn >>>>>it >>>>> 4ZKTestRunner.java:79) >>>>> >>>>> FAILED >>>>> Waiting for server down >>>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306) >>>>> at >>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64) >>>>> >>>>> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not >>>>> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier >>>>> version of >>>>> this code for me. >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have >>>>>the >>>>> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that >>>>> will >>>>> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the problem >>>>>is >>>>> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing >>>>>with >>>>> this right now. >>>>> >>>>> C >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly >>>>> doesn't >>>>>> mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload >>>>> logs so >>>>>> that we can have a look. >>>>>> >>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can anyone >>>>>>> confirm if this is an env issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release and >>>>> does >>>>>>>> not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at a >>>>>>> staging >>>>>>>>> cluster at work. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Sorry for the lag. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -rgs >>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hey PMC, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Where are your votes? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Flavio >>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" >>>>> <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I need to leave for vacation now. Unfortunately, the binding >>>>> votes >>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>> not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release >>>>> process >>>>>>>>> before I >>>>>>>>>> leave. I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18. I can pick up >>>>> the >>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>> then. Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence >>>>> and >>>>>>>>> someone >>>>>>>>>> else wants to complete the release, please feel free. If we go >>>>> that >>>>>>>>> way, >>>>>>>>>> then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties >>>>> from >>>>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>>>>> to make up for it. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally >>>>> on >>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1 +1 (binding) >>>>>>>>>>> 4 +1 (non-binding) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to >>>>> push >>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] to completion? Thank you. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers >>>> Michael. >>> >> >> >
