Thanks Pat! On 20 July 2016 at 14:57, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Site is updated. > > Patrick > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for pointing this out Chris, I'll update the site. > > > > FYI committers can view the official list here: > > https://whimsy3.apache.org/roster/committee/zookeeper > > > > Patrick > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:09 PM, Chris Nauroth > > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I had miscounted the vote from Raúl as non-binding, based on this page > >> listing him as committer instead of PMC. > >> > >> http://zookeeper.apache.org/credits.html > >> > >> Thank you for the clarification. We have the votes we need. > >> > >> (Side note: let's update that page.) > >> > >> --Chris Nauroth > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/19/16, 9:44 PM, "Flavio Junqueira" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>>What are the votes you're counting? I thought that myself, Raul, and Pat > >>>had voted +1. The three of us are PMC members. > >>> > >>>-Flavio > >>> > >>>> On 19 Jul 2016, at 21:41, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> > >>>>wrote: > >>>> > >>>> I'm back. Thanks to everyone who kept testing and voting while I was > >>>>out. > >>>> > >>>> At this point, the tally is: > >>>> > >>>> 2 +1 (binding) > >>>> 5 +1 (non-binding) > >>>> > >>>> Can we please get one more PMC member to try the release candidate and > >>>> cast a vote? (Camille, thank you for your testing and investigation > of > >>>> the test failures you saw. I understand the choice to abstain.) > >>>> > >>>> --Chris Nauroth > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 7/7/16, 11:16 AM, "Michael Han" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Add my data points: > >>>>> Java unit tests all passed on my mac and test cluster (Ubuntu 14.04). > >>>>> Both NioNettySuiteTest and NettyNettySuiteTest also passed on mac in > 5 > >>>>> runs. > >>>>> Source used for testing: > >>>>> > >>>>> > http://people.apache.org/~cnauroth/zookeeper-3.5.2-alpha-candidate-1/zoo > >>>>>ke > >>>>> eper-3.5.2-alpha.tar.gz > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected] > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Testcase: testRemoveOneAsynchronous took 60.235 sec > >>>>>> FAILED > >>>>>> Waiting for server down > >>>>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> > org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.startAll(QuorumUtil.java:143) > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.testRemoveOneAsynchronous(Reconf > >>>>>>ig > >>>>>> Test.java:436) > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>org.apache.zookeeper.JUnit4ZKTestRunner$LoggedInvokeMethod.evaluate(JUn > >>>>>>it > >>>>>> 4ZKTestRunner.java:79) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> FAILED > >>>>>> Waiting for server down > >>>>>> junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Waiting for server down > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> > org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.shutdownAll(QuorumUtil.java:241) > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.tearDown(QuorumUtil.java:306) > >>>>>> at > >>>>>> > org.apache.zookeeper.test.ReconfigTest.tearDown(ReconfigTest.java:64) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Both of these say they're waiting for server down. The logs are not > >>>>>> particularly helpful. However, this does not fail in the earlier > >>>>>> version of > >>>>>> this code for me. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I'm going to abstain from voting on this release, don't think I have > >>>>>>the > >>>>>> setup to accommodate even testing the java environment in a way that > >>>>>> will > >>>>>> be satisfactory for me given this incongruence. I suspect the > problem > >>>>>>is > >>>>>> netty-related and not ZK but I don't have the time to keep fussing > >>>>>>with > >>>>>> this right now. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> C > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Flavio P JUNQUEIRA <[email protected] > > > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> It has been passing for me and I have a macbook too, but clearly > >>>>>> doesn't > >>>>>>> mean there is nothing wrong with the test. You may want to upload > >>>>>> logs so > >>>>>>> that we can have a look. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -Flavio > >>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 4:40 p.m., "Camille Fournier" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> NioNettySuiteTest also regularly fails with this release. Can > anyone > >>>>>>>> confirm if this is an env issue? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:36 AM, Camille Fournier > >>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The NettyNettySuiteTest fails regularly for me in this release > and > >>>>>> does > >>>>>>>>> not fail in 3.5.1. Is this macbook specific? > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés < > >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I'll cast my vote today, after I see this behave for a while at > a > >>>>>>>> staging > >>>>>>>>>> cluster at work. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the lag. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -rgs > >>>>>>>>>> On Jul 7, 2016 12:58 AM, "Flavio P JUNQUEIRA" <[email protected]> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hey PMC, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Where are your votes? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> -Flavio > >>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jul 2016 5:51 a.m., "Chris Nauroth" > >>>>>> <[email protected]> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I need to leave for vacation now. Unfortunately, the binding > >>>>>> votes > >>>>>>>> have > >>>>>>>>>>> not rolled in, so I won't be able to complete the release > >>>>>> process > >>>>>>>>>> before I > >>>>>>>>>>> leave. I'll be available again on Monday, 7/18. I can pick up > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>> work > >>>>>>>>>>> then. Alternatively, if the votes comes in during my absence > >>>>>> and > >>>>>>>>>> someone > >>>>>>>>>>> else wants to complete the release, please feel free. If we go > >>>>>> that > >>>>>>>>>> way, > >>>>>>>>>>> then I could potentially pick up 3.5.3 release manager duties > >>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>>> Patrick > >>>>>>>>>>> to make up for it. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Chris Nauroth" <[email protected]> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> With inclusion of my own +1 (non-binding), the current tally > >>>>>> on > >>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] for release 3.5.2-alpha candidate 1 is: > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1 +1 (binding) > >>>>>>>>>>>> 4 +1 (non-binding) > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Can we please have 2 more PMC members cast a binding vote to > >>>>>> push > >>>>>>>> this > >>>>>>>>>>>> [VOTE] to completion? Thank you. > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --Chris Nauroth > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Cheers > >>>>> Michael. > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> >
