Li, I missed your message, sorry about that. I have added a comment on the GDoc. Overall I agree with the design.
I want to copy here a comment about the Admin API. We need to implement Authentication and Authorisation for the Admin API. I think that it should be a separate initiative, and we can put it as a pre-requisite to enable this feature. Looking forward to other comments, I hope that we can deliver this set of features for 3.9 Thank you very much Enrico Il giorno lun 8 ago 2022 alle ore 07:09 Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > Hi Patrick and Enrico, > > Not sure if you get a chance to see the design. Any comments or inputs? > > Also hope people who have already worked in the areas can chime in, so we > can have a solution working for the community. > > Thanks, > > Li > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 9:31 PM Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Sorry it took a while to get back on this. Thanks Patrick for the > > suggestion. > > > > Here is the design doc on google doc. Anyone with the link should be able > > to comment on it. Looking forward to more comments and discussions. > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UHf07ZnPi_Kyos7-DRnANmkuhv1BILNGJanZkBv12WA/edit?usp=sharing > > > > Best, > > > > Li > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 5:52 PM Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Great suggestion, Patrck. I will create an online design doc to > >> facilitate discussions and capture feedback. > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Li > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 8:30 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 9:23 PM Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> > Thanks for the inputs, Patrick. They are very valuable. > >>> > > >>> > I have similar thoughts on some of them as I worked on the feature. I > >>> will > >>> > respond to them in the JIRA ticket. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> sg. I noticed later on that the PR on gh has links to other reference > >>> material, etc... Perhaps you can update the JIRA to "link" to that > >>> material? EOD whatever material content is there, much of it should be > >>> added to the release docs. That said, having insight on eg a design > >>> doc/design decisions is also helpful for folks that want to dig deeper > >>> both > >>> during, and after, the feature lands. The JIRA ticket (epic?) is > >>> typically > >>> our central source for this, which is why I'm asking. I've found that > >>> having the design doc be a "living doc" (eg google docs during the > >>> initial > >>> stages of development) is also helpful wrt capturing feedback. I can do > >>> it > >>> through jira/email but it's hard to capture/reference context. This is a > >>> big feature set, otw I wouldn't mention. :-) > >>> > >>> Patrick > >>> > >>> > >>> > Bests, > >>> > > >>> > Li > >>> > > >>> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:08 AM Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > I think this could be a useful feature for folks. However it > >>> immediately > >>> > > raises a number of concerns if we want to ship it as a "mainline" > >>> > feature, > >>> > > I briefly started capturing here: > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4570?focusedCommentId=17565127&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-17565127 > >>> > > > >>> > > Patrick > >>> > > > >>> > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:48 AM Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks Enrico for the feedback. This is awesome! Looking forward to > >>> > more > >>> > > > comments and discussions, so we can have a solution from and for > >>> > > > the community. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Best, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Li > >>> > > > On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 10:46 PM Enrico Olivelli < > >>> eolive...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Li, > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Il Lun 11 Lug 2022, 06:58 Li Wang <li4w...@gmail.com> ha > >>> scritto: > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Hello, > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > We are working on on-demand backup and restore with streaming > >>> > > > capability, > >>> > > > > > so different databases such as zookeeper and etcd can be > >>> backed up > >>> > > and > >>> > > > > > restored via a generic external management platform. We would > >>> like > >>> > > to > >>> > > > > > contribute it to the community to benefit more users. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > This is great. > >>> > > > > I am following your work. > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > I hope that people who already worked on similar proposals can > >>> chime > >>> > > in, > >>> > > > > this way we can make it a community work > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > Enrico > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > I noticed that some great work has been done in the backup and > >>> > > restore > >>> > > > > > area, specifically the following open PRs are very interesting. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > 1. ZOOKEEPER-3499:Add a complete backup mechanism for zookeeper > >>> > > > > > internal(admin server way) #1044 （ > >>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1044） > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > 2. Add backup and restore with timetable #1883 （ > >>> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1883） > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Instead of building another variant solution, I would like to > >>> see > >>> > if > >>> > > we > >>> > > > > can > >>> > > > > > work together, combine different solutions and provide a > >>> generic > >>> > one > >>> > > > that > >>> > > > > > supports different use cases. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > To facilitate the discussion, I opened the following two JIRA > >>> > tickets > >>> > > > for > >>> > > > > > our use case. I would appreciate it if you could provide > >>> inputs or > >>> > > > > > comments. > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4570 > >>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-4571 > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Best, > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > Li > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>
