Ok, now, +1 :)
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]


On 12/08/2010, at 21:42, Rene Kluwen wrote:

> You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well… fixed at the 
> same time that you wrote this email :=).
>  
> == Rene
>  
> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks
>  
> Perhaps you need to destroy mack also?
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> [email protected]
>  
>  
>  
> On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> 
> 
> Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of 
> worries of sqlbox users?
>  
> It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself 
> (i.e. not to an smsbox).
>  
> == Rene
>  
> <sqlbox_acks_1.patch>
>  

Reply via email to