Sorry. already did it ;=).
It seems such an improvement. and not having this patch was really a bug. == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 13 August, 2010 22:24 To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Rene Kluwen; [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks Rene, do you want me to commit this one, or you'll do it? Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:58, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: Ok, now, +1 :) -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:42, Rene Kluwen wrote: You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well. fixed at the same time that you wrote this email :=). == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks Perhaps you need to destroy mack also? -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote: Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of worries of sqlbox users? It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself (i.e. not to an smsbox). == Rene <sqlbox_acks_1.patch>
