Uhmm..alright then, I will try to apply it to my version. Hope it fix the memory leak issue :)
sangprabv [email protected] http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 13, 2010, at 9:47 PM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > Nope... > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 13/08/2010, at 14:45, sangprabv wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> Does the trunk version already smooth with meta-data on previous MO lost >> issue? >> >> >> >> sangprabv >> [email protected] >> http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ >> >> >> On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >> >>> Ok, now, +1 :) >>> -- >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/08/2010, at 21:42, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>> >>>> You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well… fixed at the >>>> same time that you wrote this email :=). >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40 >>>> To: Rene Kluwen >>>> Cc: [email protected] >>>> Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks >>>> >>>> Perhaps you need to destroy mack also? >>>> -- >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of >>>> worries of sqlbox users? >>>> >>>> It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself >>>> (i.e. not to an smsbox). >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> <sqlbox_acks_1.patch> >>>> >>> >> >
