What exactly is going on here? I think I missed the discussion about this, previously I didn't follow the list completely.
Maybe I can be of help. == Rene From: sangprabv [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 13 August, 2010 14:46 To: Alejandro Guerrieri Cc: Rene Kluwen; [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks Hi Alex, Does the trunk version already smooth with meta-data on previous MO lost issue? sangprabv [email protected] http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Aug 13, 2010, at 2:58 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: Ok, now, +1 :) -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:42, Rene Kluwen wrote: You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well. fixed at the same time that you wrote this email :=). == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks Perhaps you need to destroy mack also? -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote: Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of worries of sqlbox users? It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself (i.e. not to an smsbox). == Rene <sqlbox_acks_1.patch>
