Rene, do you want me to commit this one, or you'll do it? Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected]
On 12/08/2010, at 21:58, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > Ok, now, +1 :) > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 12/08/2010, at 21:42, Rene Kluwen wrote: > >> You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well… fixed at the >> same time that you wrote this email :=). >> >> == Rene >> >> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40 >> To: Rene Kluwen >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks >> >> Perhaps you need to destroy mack also? >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote: >> >> >> Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of >> worries of sqlbox users? >> >> It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself >> (i.e. not to an smsbox). >> >> == Rene >> >> <sqlbox_acks_1.patch> >> >
