Yeah, those things are definitely on the list of things to-do. But they will be subject to another patch.
== Rene From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 13 August, 2010 21:38 To: Rene Kluwen; 'Alejandro Guerrieri' Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks What about some sanity checks? NULL msg, corrupted msg (cannot be unpacked), etc.? Also do you check about heartbeat & admin msgs? bb thinks it is an smsbox... Otherwise +1 BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Rene Kluwen To: 'Alejandro Guerrieri' Cc: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 10:42 PM Subject: RE: Sqlbox acks You were ahead of me. Yes, I needed to destroy that as well fixed at the same time that you wrote this email :=). == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 21:40 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Sqlbox acks Perhaps you need to destroy mack also? -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 12/08/2010, at 21:05, Rene Kluwen wrote: Does anybody object to this simple patch which will take away a lot of worries of sqlbox users? It generates an ack to bearerbox if a message is directed to sqlbox itself (i.e. not to an smsbox). == Rene <sqlbox_acks_1.patch>
