On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:30:36AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I think the process is actually great. I kinda prefer the direction of
> > travel where we expect that packages are actively maintained and quite
> > aggressively throw them out if they aren't, to the direction where we
> > accumulate cruft and only throw it out after extremely longwinded and
> > easily-subverted processes.
> I think if you make it easy to "throw out" packages then you must also
> make it easy to add them back later.  People do a lot of work adding
> and maintaining packages and requiring a full re-review for a package
> that was retired a few days ago is too much.

We don't. There's a grace period of several weeks where a full re-
review is not required.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to