On Fri, 2019-08-16 at 15:21 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:30:36AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I think the process is actually great. I kinda prefer the direction of > > travel where we expect that packages are actively maintained and quite > > aggressively throw them out if they aren't, to the direction where we > > accumulate cruft and only throw it out after extremely longwinded and > > easily-subverted processes. > > I think if you make it easy to "throw out" packages then you must also > make it easy to add them back later. People do a lot of work adding > and maintaining packages and requiring a full re-review for a package > that was retired a few days ago is too much.
We don't. There's a grace period of several weeks where a full re- review is not required. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://firstname.lastname@example.org