This one looks kind of like the now & later proposal, minus the later.
correct?

On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 16:50 -0700, Tony Ducrocq wrote:
> Here is my first draft : http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/194/mokup.jpg
> 
> I hope you understand my idea.
> 
> 2009/7/3 Tony Ducrocq <[email protected]>:
> > I have a different idea for EPG Guide. I'm creating a mokup but I
> > didn't have the time to finish.
> >
> > The general idea is to have *ALL* the programs in one line. Behind
> > this line, another line to restrict by channel gender (define by
> > user), then behind another line with a 'day timeline' with with the
> > hours and then a last timeline with the days.
> >
> > When you move right or left a timeline or the program list, all
> > timelines are sync and the program list too. We can imagine other
> > restrict 'bars' they can be user defined (the numbers and the
> > actions).
> >
> > I will post to the wiki a screenshot  as soon as I've finish it.
> >
> > This is just my 50 cents and sorry for my bad English.
> >
> > 2009/7/3 Daniel Chapman <[email protected]>:
> >> Interesting solution, but i definitely don't think this is a good
> idea for
> >> various reasons.
> >> Leptest
> >>
> >> 2009/7/3 Keith Cirkel <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>> To solve this, I would add buttons to the top, bottom, left and
> right. The
> >>> user navigates a "screen of buttons" and actions the "right"
> button to move
> >>> to the right, rather than moving their "cursor" (potentially
> infinitely) to
> >>> the right.
> >>> ----
> >>> Keith Cirkel
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Michał Sawicz <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Dnia 2009-07-03, pią o godzinie 10:40 +0200, David McLeod pisze:
> >>>>
> >>>> --8<--
> >>>>
> >>>> > So, what problems do I immediately see?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Well, considering that Moovida uses an opacity technique to
> tell the
> >>>> > user that additional things (e.g. bars of a list) can be
> scrolled to,
> >>>> > I am not sure how to do this with an EPG guide like this.  If
> you are
> >>>> > a visual person you might understand what I mean.  How do I do
> opacity
> >>>> > changes on the 'grey bars' we use when they move to the left of
> the
> >>>> > screen and tuck under the TV station logos?  Those bars are
> going to
> >>>> > be different lengths to represent different lengths of the TV
> >>>> > shows...then we need to do the same technique for the right of
> the
> >>>> > screen. Instinctively, I know this is going to look visually
> weird...
> >>>> > but maybe, I might be able to solve this in Photoshop or by
> testing
> >>>> > out some 'comps' to get this worked out...so for now I will
> continue.
> >>>>
> >>>> The current list modifies opacity of the whole item, right? The
> whole
> >>>> list row / grid cell gets it's opacity reduced. What I would see
> >>>> consistent with the rest of Moovida UI is a thin, constant-width
> opacity
> >>>> gradient from top to bottom on both sides of the grid. There's
> one
> >>>> problem with that... AFAIK we can't have opacity masks in current
> >>>> pigment...
> >>>>
> >>>> --8<--
> >>>>
> >>>> > Let me explain... (check out the orange arrows on the thumbnail
> >>>> > sketch) I go up and down TV stations (imagine there are 100 or
> so), so
> >>>> > that means the up and down buttons are taken... then I go left
> and
> >>>> > right through the 'timeline'... that means the left and right
> buttons
> >>>> > are taken. So, I have a problem now... I can navigate up to
> those
> >>>> > buttons so the user can switch between the views!
> >>>>
> >>>> We discussed this with Kevin in one of our posts. He proposed
> that the
> >>>> upper buttons could be accessible by going to the far left and
> left
> >>>> again (that is if the farthest left available item is "now"). I
> don't
> >>>> think that's a good idea. I'd rather have the two views separate
> in the
> >>>> menu. Watch TV > it shows you 'now & then', Programme Guide > the
> full
> >>>> fledged guide.
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Michał Sawicz <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Tony Ducrocq
> >
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Tony Ducrocq
> 
> 

Reply via email to