Thanks. So basically she just sent an email on her work account.
The civil service line is presumably that this is the equivalent of
sending a rant on official stationery. Doesn't matter whether it was
public or not, it was putting the department's name on a personal
view. The punishment does seem harsh, but the argument is at least
comprehensible -- and sadly not such a great story after all.
I don't know how much I'd actually worry about this myself, but the
question for TheyWorkForYou is whether or not it needs a warning for
the underinformed and/or overemotional that these are *not* anonymous
email links and whatever account you post from is the account you will
be known from. Seems like overkill to me, but who knows...
Unlucky Lisa.
allbests,
.................................................................................
John Browning
On 6 Jul 2009, at 20:47, Simon Gibbs wrote:
John Browning wrote:
That is a very good point, and it would seem to be a much better
story. Unless the link somehow leads to a published email -- which
the
text's un-googlability makes unlikely on the surface at least
Page would be this one - check the nav bar:
http://www.hazelblears.co.uk/contact_me
and the address [email protected]
May have been seen by an aide?
Simon
_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
_______________________________________________
Mailing list [email protected]
Archive, settings, or unsubscribe:
https://secure.mysociety.org/admin/lists/mailman/listinfo/developers-public
