> we are asking for hooks so we can define implementations for functions > (on several layers and ways), this will allow us to ship _seperate_ > implementations not part of > 1.7.0 without hacking hooks in 1.7.0 each time. We want this so we > don't have to change the taglibs midway in the 1.7.x releases. What are you actualy asking the hoocks or functionality accesible via the taglibs? It seams that you don't agree with yourselve.
- HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Pierre van Rooden
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Daniel Ockeloen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework eduard
- RE: HACK: functions-framework Rob van Maris
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Kees Jongenburger
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Daniel Ockeloen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Kees Jongenburger
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Rob Vermeulen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Michiel Meeuwissen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Daniel Ockeloen
- RE: HACK: functions-framework Rob van Maris
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Kees Jongenburger
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Daniel Ockeloen
- Re: HACK: functions-framework Daniel Ockeloen
