On Thursday 27 November 2003 11:23 am, Rob van Maris wrote: > > [X] org.mmbase.functions > > [ ] org.mmbase.bridge.functions > > [ ] org.mmbase.core.functions > > [ ] org.mmbase.module.core.functions > > [ ] something else: > > > > > > START OF CALL: 2003-11-24 > > END OF CALL: 2003-11-27 > > > > [_] +1 (YES) > > [_] +0 (ABSTAIN ) > > [X] -1 (NO), because : > > [_] VETO, because: > > I support the initiative, but as it stands no clear picture is provided > of what is actually proposed. > Basically you're asking for a carte-blanche, and that requires a project > instead of a hack-vote. > > I'm willing to reconsider if a new proposal is made, outlining in more > detail what modifications are proposed - e.g. at API level.
I feel the same. After some discution with michiel I think what they are trying to do is to NOT incorporate the functions in mmbase but create an api so that it's possible to create java classes that uses or return Nodes / NodeLists. it this right?
