Andy, do you have any feedback from our customers about this? My anecdotal
evidence so far - I have 0 bug-reports complaining they see a message:
"Incompatible version of OpenSSL" (qsslsocket_openssl_symbols.cpp, line 1025),
this means for me people using our binaries mostly have OpenSSL version below
From: Development <development-bounces+timur.pocheptsov=qt...@qt-project.org>
on behalf of Andy Shaw <andy.s...@qt.io>
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 7:44:01 AM
To: Richard Moore; email@example.com
Subject: Re: [Development] Suggestion: switch binary builds to OpenSSL 1.1 in
+ 1 from me too.
Is it clear enough from the docs for 5.9 and 5.10 that it does not support
OpenSSL 1.1? In case someone still uses that and ends up replacing their
existing installation of OpenSSL without realizing.
Fra: Development <development-bounces+andy.shaw=qt...@qt-project.org> på vegne
av Moore Richard <r...@kde.org>
Dato: torsdag 8. februar 2018 21.48
Til: "firstname.lastname@example.org" <email@example.com>
Emne: Re: [Development] Suggestion: switch binary builds to OpenSSL 1.1 in Qt
On 8 February 2018 at 18:45, Thiago Macieira
As $SUBJECT says.
Only for 5.11 onward, so shouldn't affect the 5.6 and 5.9 LTS (which don't
have OpenSSL 1.1 support anyway) or any 5.10.x releases still to come.
As a bonus side-effect, users who hadn't realised they have an old, not-up-to-
date OpenSSL will have to fix the issue.
+1 those who need to use an older version will still be able to build their
own. We really need to start actively pushing people to 1.1.
Development mailing list