Tracy R Reed wrote:If you expect only a .08% psuccess and barely a hint of specializationIs psuccess really a good measure of node/network health? IIRC, others have said it is not.
that's fine but I rather expected a bit more. :) My psuccess is slowly
creaping up (it was .02% for so long) so hopefully it's just a matter of
time and the convergence is slow due to bandwidth limitations we all have
but I am hoping for quite a bit more, especially in the routing area which
freenet so depends on.
As I have said on a few occasions, the best measurement we could have of NGR's performance would be a mean difference between estimated and actual response times. This measures exactly how well NGR is doing the job it is supposed to be doing, and can thus be used to guage the effectiveness of modifications to the NGR algorithm in terms of their effect on routing.
It won't be a pancea, for example, it won't be concerned with issues like QRs or load balancing, but it will give a specific picture of the most fundamental aspect of Freenet's performance.
Ian.
_______________________________________________ Devl mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
