On Wednesday 22 April 2009 21:17:16 xor wrote:
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: devl-bounces at freenetproject.org
> [mailto:devl-bounces at freenetproject.org] On Behalf Of Ian Clarke
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 7:58 PM
> To: Discussion of development issues
> Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] Our current web interface and its usability
> 
> 
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:05 AM, xor <xor at gmx.li> wrote:
> 
> 
> We DO NOT need a new web interface. Our current web interface is easy to
> use, works well, is sufficient, and it is also easy to write plugins which
> use it - I've worked with it for WoT and Freetalk and it was fun.
> 
> 
> 
> I hope this is true, but I'm skeptical.  I'd recomend getting some
> non-techies to try Freenet, without guidance from you, and to point out
> anything in the web interface that doesn't make sense.  I'd like to think
> that they won't find anything to point to, but I doubt it :-)
>  
> 
> The persons I've showed it to sit at their PC very much but are not experts.
> I'd call them "power users", they are familiar with eMule etc. and do not
> like wasting much time on configuring complex stuff. They were impressed by
> the clear layout of the web interface and thought it was a good
> representation of a p2p program. 

This is also what esr said. But again he is hardly a non-geek!
>  
> Anyway I've tried my best to point out anything which is difficult to use in
> my bug reports.
>  
> 
> 
> 
> We're all steeped in a pretty good understanding of Freenet, and the
> terminology used, but newbies aren't.  A term that makes perfect sense to
> us, such as Matthew's use of the term "node" in the progress page, is likely
> to confuse newbies. 
>  
> 
> "Node" should really be replaced with "Client" *everywhere* because client
> is the common word.

Client is what connects to a node, no?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: 
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20090423/cd01fb3c/attachment.pgp>

Reply via email to