On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: > > On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving >>> stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ? >>>> >>>> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP? >>> >>> I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We >>> need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired >>> organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the >>> "retired" in a top level README? >>> >>> >> I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in >> its own repository. >> >> I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on >> xwiki-contrib. >> >> Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners. >> >> I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in >> one big repository, or each project separated? > > big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib. > > That makes the most sense to me since: > * it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox > * it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones > * it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't > need their own repos
Done. All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin integration, waiting for him to move it out. After that, the only active thing left in the whole SVN repository would be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet. -- Sergiu Dumitriu http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
