On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: > On 08/12/2011 05:46 AM, Vincent Massol wrote: >> >> On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent Massol<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving >>>> stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ? >>>>> >>>>> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP? >>>> >>>> I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We >>>> need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired >>>> organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the >>>> "retired" in a top level README? >>>> >>>> >>> I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in >>> its own repository. >>> >>> I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on >>> xwiki-contrib. >>> >>> Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners. >>> >>> I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in >>> one big repository, or each project separated? >> >> There's also the question of where to put retired projects. >> >> Right now I see only 2 options: >> 1) leave them in xwiki-contrib but add a README file at top level mentioning >> what they've been replaced with >> 2) create a xwiki-retired organization and move retired projects there >> >> Before we make a choice we need to agree on the definition of "retired". >> Here's what I think it is: >> - projects for which there's a new and better way of doing it >> - projects that have not been active for a certain time (like the Attic in >> the ASF - http://attic.apache.org/). Done with a VOTE on a case by case basis >> >> If we choose 2) maybe we rename the org to xwiki-attic instead of >> xwiki-retried. >> >> WDYT? >> >> Personally I'm hesitating. If github had a better top level repo org I'd >> choose 1) but seen the current way it's handled I think I'm slightly in >> favor of 2). > > For the moment I put them on xwiki-contrib, in a "retired" repository.
ok but how do you handle branches/tags in a single repository for all retired projects? Thanks -Vincent > > For the future, I agree that an xwiki-attic organization would be > better; still, I prefer to leave things as they are for the moment, > until we find something else to put there (old XWiki Workspaces, old > XWatch). > > -- > Sergiu Dumitriu > http://purl.org/net/sergiu/ > _______________________________________________ > devs mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs _______________________________________________ devs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
