Let's say I'm ok with the list - but not very happy about the secrecy trend.


Thanks,
Caty

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 13:34, Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:33, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> after thinking about it (and an IRL discussion with Vincent) here's my
> >> updated point of view on this:
> >>
> >>   - Have a private mailing list for committers
> >>      - If a committer feels that it's time for a contributor to become a
> >>      committer, he suggests her on the private mailing list
> >>      - Discussion on the private list ensues, committers decide whether
> the
> >>      contributor is ready or not
> >>   - If the contributor is not deemed ready, the process stops
> >>   - If the contributor is deemed ready, the proposer talks to her
> privately
> >>   and asks her whether she would be interested in becoming a committer
> >>      - If she's not interested, the process stops
> >>      - If she's interested, a public vote is launched on the devs
> mailing
> >>      list
> >>
> >> This way the vote is still public and non-committers can voice their
> >> feedback, but there is a central location for the initial discussion
> >> (instead of the proposer having to go and talk to every committer
> privately
> >> on Skype, IRC and the like). We also keep the benefits of people
> standing
> >> publicly by their votes.
> >>
> >> WDYT?
> >>
> >
> > I have refrain myself from adding to the discussion until now since I was
> > strongly -1 initially, but presented this way, I am now +1. I would add
> > that, anything that a commiter do not feel ready for public discussion
> could
> > be discussed on this private ML, but that nothing could be decide there
> > without a public vote. This is already what we could do by skype or other
> > direct discussion, and it therefore does not change anything to the
> current
> > transparency of the project governance.
>
> IMO it's good to have this mailing list for a simple reason: if any
> committer need to say something to other committers and is not yet
> comfortable making it public it should definitely be sent to this
> mailing list instead of nothing. We can always decide to move the
> discussion to the public mailing list after. Be it about new committer
> or anything else.
>
> >
> > Denis
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Guillaume
> >>
> >> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Jerome Velociter <
> [email protected]
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I know Vincent retracted this vote for now, but just for the record
> >> > and for the balance, I would definitely have +1'd.
> >> > I support especially the point that it's tough to express reserves on
> >> > someone's work publicly, even in an open world. And that in the end we
> >> > might tend to just not do it when we should.
> >> >
> >> > Jerome
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Hi devs,
> >> > >
> >> > > There are a few topics that are not supposed to be public or that
> would
> >> > be better be not public.
> >> > >
> >> > > One such topic is when we want to VOTE someone as a committer. It's
> >> very
> >> > uncomfortable to do this in the open for the following reasons:
> >> > > * committers are tempted to VOTE +1 since voting negatively is seen
> >> > publicly, including by the person being voted on
> >> > > * it's very undelicate to have this in the open especially if the
> >> person
> >> > is voted down since that'll affect that person's morale and future
> >> > participation in the project
> >> > >
> >> > > So I'd like to propose creating a [email protected] list with
> the
> >> > following characteristics:
> >> > > * private, visible only to committers
> >> > >
> >> > > I also propose it to use it for voting committers.
> >> > >
> >> > > WDYT?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > -Vincent
> >> > >
> >> > > _______________________________________________
> >> > > devs mailing list
> >> > > [email protected]
> >> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Jérôme Velociter
> >> > Winesquare
> >> > http://www.winesquare.net/
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > devs mailing list
> >> > [email protected]
> >> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devs mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Denis Gervalle
> > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > eGuilde sarl - CTO
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to