+1 too,

Thanks,
Marius

On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Gervalle <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:33, Guillaume Lerouge <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> after thinking about it (and an IRL discussion with Vincent) here's my
>> updated point of view on this:
>>
>>   - Have a private mailing list for committers
>>      - If a committer feels that it's time for a contributor to become a
>>      committer, he suggests her on the private mailing list
>>      - Discussion on the private list ensues, committers decide whether the
>>      contributor is ready or not
>>   - If the contributor is not deemed ready, the process stops
>>   - If the contributor is deemed ready, the proposer talks to her privately
>>   and asks her whether she would be interested in becoming a committer
>>      - If she's not interested, the process stops
>>      - If she's interested, a public vote is launched on the devs mailing
>>      list
>>
>> This way the vote is still public and non-committers can voice their
>> feedback, but there is a central location for the initial discussion
>> (instead of the proposer having to go and talk to every committer privately
>> on Skype, IRC and the like). We also keep the benefits of people standing
>> publicly by their votes.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> I have refrain myself from adding to the discussion until now since I was
> strongly -1 initially, but presented this way, I am now +1. I would add
> that, anything that a commiter do not feel ready for public discussion could
> be discussed on this private ML, but that nothing could be decide there
> without a public vote. This is already what we could do by skype or other
> direct discussion, and it therefore does not change anything to the current
> transparency of the project governance.
>
> Denis
>
>
>>
>> Guillaume
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 4:18 AM, Jerome Velociter <[email protected]
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I know Vincent retracted this vote for now, but just for the record
>> > and for the balance, I would definitely have +1'd.
>> > I support especially the point that it's tough to express reserves on
>> > someone's work publicly, even in an open world. And that in the end we
>> > might tend to just not do it when we should.
>> >
>> > Jerome
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Vincent Massol <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> > > Hi devs,
>> > >
>> > > There are a few topics that are not supposed to be public or that would
>> > be better be not public.
>> > >
>> > > One such topic is when we want to VOTE someone as a committer. It's
>> very
>> > uncomfortable to do this in the open for the following reasons:
>> > > * committers are tempted to VOTE +1 since voting negatively is seen
>> > publicly, including by the person being voted on
>> > > * it's very undelicate to have this in the open especially if the
>> person
>> > is voted down since that'll affect that person's morale and future
>> > participation in the project
>> > >
>> > > So I'd like to propose creating a [email protected] list with the
>> > following characteristics:
>> > > * private, visible only to committers
>> > >
>> > > I also propose it to use it for voting committers.
>> > >
>> > > WDYT?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > -Vincent
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > devs mailing list
>> > > [email protected]
>> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Jérôme Velociter
>> > Winesquare
>> > http://www.winesquare.net/
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devs mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Denis Gervalle
> SOFTEC sa - CEO
> eGuilde sarl - CTO
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs

Reply via email to