I think now it's fixed: the {{code}} and edit right problems.
Thanks Jeremie for reporting,
Caty
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <
[email protected]> wrote:
> It's **almost** ok, now I can view the page when logged in, but I still
> don't have edit rights ... ;)
>
>
> 2013/11/18 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
>
> > Ok this time it's really ok...
> >
> > There was not existing groups with rights set to them on that wiki.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Mortagne
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I had forgotten one, should be ok now.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
> > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> Same issue here ...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> 2013/11/18 Thomas Mortagne <[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >>> I configured the design wiki rights like others sub wikis rights.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne
> > >>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> > Sounds like "code" css class is broken in that skin (this class is
> > >>> > supposed to follow newlines and white spaces like <pre>).
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
> > >>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >> Another thing, seems now the {{code}} macro puts everything on one
> > line
> > >>> ...
> > >>> >> (at least, for unauthentified user).
> > >>> >> Same page:
> > >>> >>
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> BR,
> > >>> >> Jeremie
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >> 2013/11/18 Marius Dumitru Florea <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>
> > >>> >>> Someone else complained to me about this rights issue too and I
> > >>> couldn't
> > >>> >>> reproduce with my user because I have special rights.
> > >>> >>> On Nov 15, 2013 5:18 PM, "Jeremie BOUSQUET" <
> > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>> wrote:
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >>> > Hello,
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > Maybe it's not finished yet or I missed something, but if I
> > browse
> > >>> this
> > >>> >>> > page:
> > >>> >>> >
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > If I'm not authentified, I can see the page.
> > >>> >>> > If I log in (in order to edit the page), I can't even see the
> > page
> > >>> ("You
> > >>> >>> > are not allowed to view this document or perform this action
> > ...").
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > 2013/11/15 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <[email protected]>
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > > Hi,
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Vincent Massol <
> > >>> [email protected]>
> > >>> >>> > > wrote:
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
> <
> > >>> >>> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > Hi,
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > I've finished moving the content from
> > >>> >>> > > > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/WebHome and
> > >>> >>> > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org (Improvements, Standards,
> > Tech,
> > >>> >>> Mockups
> > >>> >>> > > > > spaces) to the new wiki
> > >>> >>> > > > > http://design.xwiki.org/
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > Woohoo :) Nice progress from before, well done!
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > Some quick comments:
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * Is it possible to remove the centered thing and do the
> > same as
> > >>> on
> > >>> >>> > other
> > >>> >>> > > > subwikis of xwiki.org? (consistency!)
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > The proposal pages are full width just like the other pages
> on
> > >>> >>> xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > .
> > >>> >>> > > The only centered page is design:Main.WebHome which is
> > consistent
> > >>> with
> > >>> >>> > > xwiki:Main.WebHome. I won't change that.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * It's a real pity that you seem to have lost the history
> and
> > >>> thus
> > >>> >>> > > creation
> > >>> >>> > > > date/author and last modified date/author since ideally the
> > LT
> > >>> should
> > >>> >>> > be
> > >>> >>> > > > filtered by latest proposal first (as for the Extensions of
> > >>> e.x.o).
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > Just like on e.x.o the livetable is filtered after 'Last
> > modified'.
> > >>> >>> Pages
> > >>> >>> > > on design.xwiki.org have suffered modifications (objects
> > added,
> > >>> etc.)
> > >>> >>> so
> > >>> >>> > > it's normal that they are modified in the past week.
> > >>> >>> > > I haven't lost the history (except for 4 pages). All the
> other
> > have
> > >>> >>> been
> > >>> >>> > > imported with history, but when you look at them you see they
> > were
> > >>> >>> > created
> > >>> >>> > > by me because that's how we handle import and copy (see
> > >>> >>> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-925)
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * I think you've been a bit overzeleaous in changing states
> > of
> > >>> >>> > > proposals...
> > >>> >>> > > > going to try to fix some. At least that's a good way to
> reset
> > >>> >>> > everything
> > >>> >>> > > :)
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > I used scripts: copied the state from old dev:Design space,
> > added
> > >>> >>> > > 'completed' state for the incubator pages. I've updated some
> > >>> statuses
> > >>> >>> for
> > >>> >>> > > some of them, yes.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * "Active" vs "Dormant" is too hard IMO. What's the
> > criteria? For
> > >>> >>> > example
> > >>> >>> > > > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/APM Nobody
> is
> > >>> working
> > >>> >>> > > > actively but it's something I believe we need and it's
> still
> > >>> valid.
> > >>> >>> > What
> > >>> >>> > > > about
> > >>> >>> >
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/AlternateURLSchemeI'm
> > >>> >>> > > > working on it, once every 4 months. I think these 2 states
> > are
> > >>> too
> > >>> >>> hard
> > >>> >>> > > to
> > >>> >>> > > > maintain because nobody is going to move them from Active
> to
> > >>> Dormant.
> > >>> >>> > I'd
> > >>> >>> > > > suggest we replace both "Active" and "Dormant" by "Open"
> > because
> > >>> I
> > >>> >>> > don't
> > >>> >>> > > > think we need to separate them. "Open" should list all
> > designs
> > >>> about
> > >>> >>> > > things
> > >>> >>> > > > that we wish to do. Those that we don't want to do should
> be
> > in
> > >>> >>> > > "Dropped".
> > >>> >>> > > > WDYT?
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > I have a list with like 5 variants of states we could have
> for
> > this
> > >>> >>> app.
> > >>> >>> > If
> > >>> >>> > > you really want to have this discussion about the naming we
> > could,
> > >>> but
> > >>> >>> > the
> > >>> >>> > > current variant is: 'Idea', 'Active', 'Dormant', 'Completed',
> > >>> >>> 'Dropped'.
> > >>> >>> > > Because we had the discussion about the Status of the project
> > at
> > >>> the
> > >>> >>> > > seminar and that is not visible what is on going and what we
> > might
> > >>> want
> > >>> >>> > to
> > >>> >>> > > achieve, I've added the 2 states. If we are going to add (Not
> > >>> planned)
> > >>> >>> > also
> > >>> >>> > > a 'Target' column to specify the version we want to release
> > that
> > >>> >>> feature,
> > >>> >>> > > having an 'Active' state is important since it shows the
> > features
> > >>> we
> > >>> >>> are
> > >>> >>> > > really working on.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > We could have like a job that listens if a page was not
> > modified
> > >>> for a
> > >>> >>> > > certain period of time and change the status from 'Active' to
> > >>> 'Dormant'
> > >>> >>> > > (Not planned).
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > As mentioned in my early mail I don't really know the status
> of
> > >>> others'
> > >>> >>> > > proposals so that's why I asked of you if you could update
> > them in
> > >>> >>> order
> > >>> >>> > to
> > >>> >>> > > be accurate.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * Is
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/CAPTCHAIntegration#Historyreally
> > >>> >>> > > > "Dropped"? Shouldn't it be "Completed"?
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > I haven't changed the Status of this proposal, so this is how
> > it
> > >>> must
> > >>> >>> > have
> > >>> >>> > > been put by Jerome on devs wiki. Actually the devs status was
> > >>> 'Dead'
> > >>> >>> > which
> > >>> >>> > > in the new application is marked as 'Dropped'.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * I don't understand how you categorize designs and how you
> > link
> > >>> them
> > >>> >>> > > > together, for ex:
> > >>> >>> > > >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/SearchLucene
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > The proposals are linked together by using the parent/child
> > >>> >>> relationship.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > * I don't really understand why you consider "Design" to be
> > >>> about UI
> > >>> >>> > > > only... For ex
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/AlternateURLSchemeis
> > >>> >>> > > purely
> > >>> >>> > > > design and you categorized it as "Feature".
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > For me what is related to visual aspects is 'Design', what is
> > >>> related
> > >>> >>> to
> > >>> >>> > > code is 'Implementation'. We could discuss and add more
> states
> > but
> > >>> I've
> > >>> >>> > > tried to pick the easiest ones.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > I agree with Vincent, in practice the page about Mail archive I
> > work
> > >>> on
> > >>> >>> > (listed above) describes both UI and Code of the app. By the
> way
> > it
> > >>> >>> > contradicts the name of the whole subwiki ("design.xwiki.org
> "),
> > >>> >>> > considering
> > >>> >>> > the scope of this subwiki is not limited to proposals on visual
> > >>> aspects,
> > >>> >>> so
> > >>> >>> > it should not be the same term IMO for the whole subwiki and
> for
> > this
> > >>> >>> > category Design (vs Implementation), or then you should call
> the
> > >>> subwiki
> > >>> >>> "
> > >>> >>> > design-and-implementation.xwiki.org" :) . Design vs
> > Implementation
> > >>> makes
> > >>> >>> > me
> > >>> >>> > think of Architecture vs Code but maybe it's a
> developer-centric
> > >>> view :)
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> > > 'Feature' is used for 'parent' categories and for proposals
> > that
> > >>> don't
> > >>> >>> > > belong to any other category (you could create a special page
> > to
> > >>> be set
> > >>> >>> > as
> > >>> >>> > > parent or use the current as feature).
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > > I also don't understand what
> > >>> >>> > > > "Feature'" means. And why a proposal of "Design" cannot
> > include
> > >>> >>> > > > requirements?
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > This was a limitation of the application (I was displaying
> > related
> > >>> >>> pages
> > >>> >>> > > livetable just for Feature proposal), now is fixed. If a page
> > have
> > >>> >>> > children
> > >>> >>> > > it will display them.
> > >>> >>> > > Again if you find something that is misplaced please help me
> > fix
> > >>> it.
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > Thanks,
> > >>> >>> > > Caty
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > > Or is it just the "latest" stage it's in but that doesn't
> > >>> >>> > > > mean much in agile dev since the design and code work
> > together
> > >>> and
> > >>> >>> are
> > >>> >>> > > > cycling in small iterations... :)
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > Thanks!
> > >>> >>> > > > -Vincent
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > Since I've been using scripts, the Participants and
> Status
> > >>> might
> > >>> >>> not
> > >>> >>> > be
> > >>> >>> > > > > accurate since I marked most of them as Completed. Feel
> > free to
> > >>> >>> mark
> > >>> >>> > > your
> > >>> >>> > > > > proposal accordingly and maybe even change the parent
> > >>> hierarchy if
> > >>> >>> > you
> > >>> >>> > > > find
> > >>> >>> > > > > your proposal in the wrong place.
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > Thanks,
> > >>> >>> > > > > Caty
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> > >>> >>> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Ecaterina Moraru
> (Valica)
> > >>> >>> > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Hi,
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *Short version* for voting:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *A*. Creation of a new wiki on xwiki.org farm that
> > will
> > >>> hold
> > >>> >>> > > > > development
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > process details about a specific feature. This wiki
> > will
> > >>> >>> > deprecate
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > dev.xwiki.org:Design and incubator.myxwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > +1
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *B*. Vote on naming alternatives for this new wiki:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > design.xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > incubator.xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > +1 for design.xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > > -0 for incubator.xwiki.org, "incubator" means
> > >>> implementations
> > >>> >>> > > waiting
> > >>> >>> > > > > > to be approved in some mainstream repository for me not
> > >>> design
> > >>> >>> and
> > >>> >>> > > > > > architecture. It would make more sense used as the name
> > of a
> > >>> >>> github
> > >>> >>> > > > > > repository/organization associated to this wiki for
> > example.
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *C*. UI on how a Proposal will be displayed in this
> new
> > >>> wiki
> > >>> >>> > > (example
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > AppWithinMinutes):
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDesignWiki
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > Looks very nice. Same as Denis, it's very important
> that
> > >>> it's as
> > >>> >>> > easy
> > >>> >>> > > > > > as possible to use and not a constraint in order to
> > actually
> > >>> be
> > >>> >>> > used.
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *Long version: *
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Right now development process activities are located
> in
> > >>> >>> multiple
> > >>> >>> > > > > places:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - Analysis + Architecture:
> > >>> >>> > > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - Analysis + User Interface:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - Other: http://xwiki.markmail.org/,
> > http://jira.xwiki.org
> > >>> ,
> > >>> >>> > chats,
> > >>> >>> > > > git
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > comments, etc.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > This process can be hard to optimize and information
> is
> > >>> hard to
> > >>> >>> > > track
> > >>> >>> > > > > if
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > you are looking for specific information.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > And the worst part of it is that is hard to
> automatize
> > and
> > >>> lots
> > >>> >>> > of
> > >>> >>> > > > the
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > items need manual gathering or search.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *Part A. *
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > This mail is about combining
> > >>> >>> > > > > > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/and
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/ work in a single
> place.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > This has already been discussed several times before
> (
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/kc32dufsf7nyyt6sand
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/izj6aiyodwqia4vl)
> > and the
> > >>> >>> vote
> > >>> >>> > > was
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > favorable in this direction.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The proposal was to create a new wiki called
> > >>> >>> design.xwiki.orgthat
> > >>> >>> > > > > will
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > contain the combined information and that will target
> > >>> >>> developers.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The new wiki will be used to gather only proposal's
> > >>> development
> > >>> >>> > > > process
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > information: requirements, architecture, solutions
> > >>> >>> alternatives,
> > >>> >>> > > user
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > interface variants, planning, etc. for a specific
> > >>> >>> > > > > > feature/idea/improvement.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > After the proposal is implemented it will be properly
> > >>> >>> documented
> > >>> >>> > in
> > >>> >>> > > > the
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > right location for users (ex platform.xwiki.org).
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > It is acceptable to have CSS + JS code on this wiki
> in
> > >>> order to
> > >>> >>> > > > > > demonstrate
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > the functionality of the proposals, but we should not
> > add
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > experimental/dangerous code (groovy scripts, jars,
> > etc.).
> > >>> For
> > >>> >>> > this
> > >>> >>> > > > case
> > >>> >>> > > > > > it
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > is advisable to use a test machine, share your own
> > >>> instance or
> > >>> >>> > use
> > >>> >>> > > > the
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > contrib.xwiki.org repository for hosting.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The version upgrades will be handle by a community
> > admin
> > >>> and
> > >>> >>> the
> > >>> >>> > > wiki
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > gardening by me.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The data from incubator.myxwiki.org and
> dev.xwiki.org:
> > >>> Design
> > >>> >>> > will
> > >>> >>> > > be
> > >>> >>> > > > > > moved
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > gradually after the new wiki is created.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *Part B. *
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > You should state your opinion regarding which name is
> > >>> better
> > >>> >>> for
> > >>> >>> > > the
> > >>> >>> > > > > new
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > wiki:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - design.xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - incubator.xwiki.org
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > - we accept other proposals.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > *Part C.*
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > I've made a proposal on how a proposal page would
> look
> > >>> like:
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>>
> > >>>
> >
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDesignWiki
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The proposal page will gather all the information
> > related
> > >>> to
> > >>> >>> it,
> > >>> >>> > > > making
> > >>> >>> > > > > > it
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > easier to track it's progress.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The entries will be separated depending on 4
> > categories:
> > >>> >>> > Analysis,
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Architecture, User Interface and Implementation, each
> > >>> category
> > >>> >>> > > having
> > >>> >>> > > > > > it's
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > own status, participants, jiras and timeframe.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Categories are not mandatory for all proposals,
> smaller
> > >>> >>> proposals
> > >>> >>> > > > will
> > >>> >>> > > > > > have
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > just the related pages for certain areas.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Each proposal will store it's data in a dedicated
> > space.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > The implementation of the proposal will be handled by
> > me.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Let me know what you think.
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > Caty
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > > > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> > > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > > --
> > >>> >>> > > > > > Thomas Mortagne
> > >>> >>> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > > > > > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > > > > > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> > > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > > > > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > > > > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> > > > >
> > >>> >>> > > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > > > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > > > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> > > >
> > >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> > >
> > >>> >>> > _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> > devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> > [email protected]
> > >>> >>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>> >
> > >>> >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >>> devs mailing list
> > >>> >>> [email protected]
> > >>> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >>>
> > >>> >> _______________________________________________
> > >>> >> devs mailing list
> > >>> >> [email protected]
> > >>> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > Thomas Mortagne
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Thomas Mortagne
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> devs mailing list
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> devs mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thomas Mortagne
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thomas Mortagne
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
