On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis
luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis
luehring
no problem :)
so tell the story what would happen if D scripts will be
without .d?
is your Boss then more interested or can you introduce
D-scripts then silently - what would happen?
He won't really care as long as I don't ask him to modify his
scripts to update the names of those used by me. The latter are
already hard-coded in his and others.
Yes, this has a solution: use of hardlinks (of identical-content,
different name files). I already explained and acknowledged that
in the very first post.
But is cumbersome and unpleasant and bad for backup-ing.
