On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:34:37 UTC, dennis luehring wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:22, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 15:13:20 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 16:01, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:57:15 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:45, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:39:34 UTC, dennis luehring
wrote:
Am 31.10.2013 15:29, schrieb eles:
On Thursday, 31 October 2013 at 14:28:05 UTC, dennis
luehring
no problem :)

so tell the story what would happen if D scripts will be without .d? is your Boss then more interested or can you introduce D-scripts then silently - what would happen?

He won't really care as long as I don't ask him to modify his scripts to update the names of those used by me. The latter are already hard-coded in his and others.

Yes, this has a solution: use of hardlinks (of identical-content, different name files). I already explained and acknowledged that in the very first post.

But is cumbersome and unpleasant and bad for backup-ing.

Reply via email to