ilya-stromberg píše v St 22. 01. 2014 v 14:38 +0000: > On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote: > > The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not > > simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements? > > Guys, were are you was a few days ago when voting still was open?! > > Dicebot, can we continue voting at least 1-2 weeks? It looks like > we finally have interest to the `std.signal` module. +1
- Re: std.signal : voting has begu... Xavier Bigand
- Re: std.signal : voting has begun David Nadlinger
- Re: std.signal : voting has begun Martin Nowak
- std.signal : voting results Dicebot
- Re: std.signal : voting results Dicebot
- Re: std.signal : voting results Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.signal : voting results Dicebot
- Re: std.signal : voting results Jacob Carlborg
- Re: std.signal : voting results Dejan Lekic
- Re: std.signal : voting results ilya-stromberg
- Re: std.signal : voting results Daniel Kozák
- Re: std.signal : voting results Dicebot
- Re: std.signal : voting results Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: std.signal : voting results robert
- Re: std.signal : voting results Johannes Pfau
- Re: std.signal : voting results David Nadlinger
- Re: std.signal : voting results ilya-stromberg
- Re: std.signal : voting results Kagamin